JOURNAL ARTICLE
Leaving the Umbrella in a Rainstorm: The Supreme Court's Failure to Protect Voting Rights.
Published In: Human Rights, 2026, v. 51, n. 3. P. 20 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Crayton, Kareem 3 of 3
Abstract
The article examines recent shifts in the U.S. federal judiciary's approach to voting rights, highlighting a departure from the broad bipartisan support that underpinned the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA). It details how key Supreme Court decisions, such as Shelby County v. Holder (2013), have weakened protections like the Act’s preclearance requirement, despite congressional reaffirmation of its necessity. The article also discusses the Court’s refusal to address partisan gerrymandering, the expansion of legislative privilege shielding state lawmakers from scrutiny, and emerging challenges to the ability of private citizens to bring voting rights lawsuits. These judicial trends raise concerns about the future enforcement of voting rights and the representativeness of American democracy. [Extracted from the article]
Additional Information
- Source:Human Rights. 2026/03, Vol. 51, Issue 3, p20
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Social Sciences and Humanities
- Publication Date:2026
- ISSN:0046-8185
- Accession Number:192468449
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Human Rights is the property of American Bar Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.