JOURNAL ARTICLE
Individual differences in the illusion of self-motion (vection): The role of field dependence, anomalous perceptual experiences, and tolerance of ambiguity.
Published In: Perception, 2025, v. 54, n. 7. P. 534 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Stróżak, Paweł; Jankowski, Tomasz; Wojtasiński, Marcin; Augustynowicz, Paweł 3 of 3
Abstract
This article investigates how individual-difference factors influence vection, the illusion of self-motion arising from conflicting sensory inputs. Analyzing data from 170 healthy adults exposed to visual stimuli inducing vection, the study found that higher field dependence—a cognitive style favoring external visual cues—was associated with faster onset of vection. Additionally, lower tolerance of ambiguity, reflecting discomfort with uncertain situations, correlated with longer duration and greater intensity of the illusion, especially under faster visual stimulation. While anomalous perceptual experiences (a domain of psychotic-like experiences) showed only weak tendencies to affect vection, biological sex had no significant impact. The findings are interpreted within a Bayesian framework of multisensory integration, suggesting that internal predispositions shape how sensory conflicts are resolved, influencing the strength and persistence of illusory self-motion.
Additional Information
- Source:Perception. 2025/07, Vol. 54, Issue 7, p534
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Social Sciences and Humanities
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:0301-0066
- DOI:10.1177/03010066251337355
- Accession Number:186128678
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Perception is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.