JOURNAL ARTICLE
Dividing the Carolinas: Indians, Colonists, and Slaves in the Prerevolutionary Boundary Dispute, 1763–1773.
Published In: Early American Studies, An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2023, v. 21, n. 1. P. 42 1 of 3
Database: America: History and Life with Full Text 2 of 3
Authored By: MARSHALL, STUART H. 3 of 3
Abstract
Between 1763 and 1773, North and South Carolina officials intensified their competition over their western backcountry when they attempted to resolve the boundary that had remained in question for decades. Historiography about this boundary has failed to recognize how common people in the Carolinas—Indians, colonists, and slaves—set the terms for the dispute and shaped the geography of early America. This boundary dispute offers a unique comparative glimpse of the Carolinas and exposes their most severe internal divisions—for North Carolina, the widespread Regulator movement that originated in disputes over western land, and for South Carolina, the heightened risk of slave revolts that accompanied the province’s development. Catawba Indians occupied a central focus of the dispute, courted as an essential ally by South Carolina, while Cherokees hoped to halt the western expansion of both Carolinas. The boundary dispute determined the future of the diverging Carolinas, particularly in foreshadowing the tensions of state formation that manifested during the American Revolution. Indians, colonists, and slaves claimed their own spaces in between the imaginary lines of imperial power. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Early American Studies, An Interdisciplinary Journal. 2023/01, Vol. 21, Issue 1, p42
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Social Sciences and Humanities
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:1543-4273
- DOI:10.1353/eam.2023.0001
- Accession Number:162902798
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Early American Studies, An Interdisciplinary Journal is the property of University of Pennsylvania Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.