JOURNAL ARTICLE
economy is human: A corpus-based comparative study in English and Chinese economic media discourse.
Published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2023, v. 21, n. 2. P. 411 1 of 3
Database: Communication Source 2 of 3
Authored By: Xu, Yuting; Royce, Terry; Hu, Chunyu 3 of 3
Abstract
Utilizing the framework of Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory (ECMT), this paper presents a corpus-based multi-level comparative study of the economy is human metaphor in English and Chinese economic media discourse. While the results indicate a considerable sharing of their respective conceptual structures of "human body", "human condition" and "human relationship", they do reveal some differences in terms of their preference and the associated metaphorical expressions. The similarities detected can possibly be attributed to the similar body, physiological function and social attributes all human beings share, which then work as the source for drawing inferences about the economy. The differences however are also likely to be derived from the different saliences of human experience which characterize the English and Chinese social-cultural contexts. Another possible explanation for these differing culturally-sourced linguistic metaphors may well be media language and its idiosyncratic stylistic features. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Review of Cognitive Linguistics. 2023/07, Vol. 21, Issue 2, p411
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Social Sciences and Humanities
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:1877-9751
- DOI:10.1075/rcl.00140.xu
- Accession Number:174269331
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Review of Cognitive Linguistics is the property of John Benjamins Publishing Co. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.