JOURNAL ARTICLE
Does Varying the Order of Sexual Orientation Response Categories Change Population Estimates? Findings from a Nationally Representative Study of U.S. Adults.
Published In: Journal of Survey Statistics & Methodology, 2025, v. 13, n. 1. P. 3 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Hansen, Christopher; Christian, Leah M; Fordyce, Erin; David, Bryn 3 of 3
Abstract
This article examines how the order of response categories affects the measurement of sexual orientation in surveys of U.S. adults. Using a nationally representative sample of 2,099 adults in 2022, the study compared the standard response order—listing "lesbian or gay" first followed by "straight, that is, not lesbian or gay"—with an alternative order that presented "straight" first. Results showed no significant differences in sexual orientation estimates by response order, except for a lower proportion of "I don't know the answer" responses when "straight" was listed first. Younger adults were more likely to select "I don't know," suggesting this response may reflect sexual fluidity or uncertainty rather than nonresponse. The findings indicate that ordering response categories by population prevalence may reduce item nonresponse and improve data quality, though further research with larger samples and diverse survey modes is recommended.
Additional Information
- Source:Journal of Survey Statistics & Methodology. 2025/02, Vol. 13, Issue 1, p3
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Social Sciences and Humanities
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:2325-0984
- DOI:10.1093/jssam/smae042
- Accession Number:182904995
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Survey Statistics & Methodology is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.