JOURNAL ARTICLE

Discrimination as a Public Wrong.

  • Published In: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2024, v. 44, n. 3. P. 509 1 of 3

  • Database: Business Source Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Goldiner, Adi 3 of 3

Abstract

The article examines the justification for public enforcement mechanisms in anti-discrimination law, focusing on the puzzle that while discrimination is commonly viewed as a private wrong against individuals, many jurisdictions empower public officials to initiate legal claims independently of victims' preferences. Drawing on theories of state enforcement in criminal law, it argues that discrimination should also be understood as a public wrong—one that harms community values and society at large—thereby warranting public enforcement beyond instrumental benefits such as overcoming barriers faced by individual claimants. The article analyzes different enforcement models in Canada, the UK, and the United States, critiques purely instrumental justifications, and develops principled grounds for public enforcement based on discrimination's broader social impact. It concludes that recognizing discrimination as a public wrong has important implications for the design and exercise of enforcement powers in anti-discrimination law.

Additional Information

  • Source:Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2024/09, Vol. 44, Issue 3, p509
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:0143-6503
  • DOI:10.1093/ojls/gqae011
  • Accession Number:179421749
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Oxford Journal of Legal Studies is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.