JOURNAL ARTICLE
Adoption of LGBT-Inclusive Policies: Social Construction, Coercion, or Competition?
Published In: Social Forces, 2023, v. 101, n. 3. P. 1116 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Gardberg, Naomi A; Newburry, William; Hudson, Bryant A; Viktora-Jones, Magdalena 3 of 3
Abstract
This article examines the adoption of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT)-inclusive workplace policies by U.S. firms within a complex and contested institutional environment characterized by competing coercive, social constructivist, and competitive forces. Using a longitudinal dataset of 283 Fortune 500 firms’ policy ratings from 2002 to 2014 provided by the Human Rights Campaign’s Corporate Equality Index (CEI), the study finds that state-level prohibitions on same-sex marriage negatively influence LGBT-inclusive policy adoption, while shareholder activist resolutions and industry-level adoption exert positive coercive and competitive pressures, respectively. Social construction forces, such as public consensus on marriage equality and advocacy by human resource specialists, show more limited and dimension-specific effects, primarily influencing equal employment opportunity policies. The findings highlight the uneven and multifaceted diffusion of LGBT workplace policies shaped by legal, social, and market dynamics in a stigmatized and politically fragmented U.S. context.
Additional Information
- Source:Social Forces. 2023/03, Vol. 101, Issue 3, p1116
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Social Sciences and Humanities
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:0037-7732
- DOI:10.1093/sf/soac033
- Accession Number:161313560
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Social Forces is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.