JOURNAL ARTICLE
Psychological Distance and Algorithm Aversion: Congruency and Advisor Confidence.
Published In: Service Science (INFORMS), 2025, v. 17, n. 2/3. P. 74 1 of 3
Database: Business Source Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Kirshner, Samuel N. 3 of 3
Abstract
The article investigates how psychological distance influences individuals’ preferences between human and algorithmic advisors, applying construal level theory (CLT) to explain algorithm aversion and appreciation. It finds that people perceive algorithms as psychologically more distant and abstract than human advisors, despite viewing algorithmic outputs at a lower construal level. Across multiple studies, greater temporal, spatial, or social distance within tasks decreases confidence in human advisors but not in algorithms, leading to increased preference for algorithmic advice when tasks or advisors are perceived as psychologically distant. Confidence mediates this relationship, and these effects hold across different contexts such as financial forecasting and hiring decisions. The research integrates social and technical factors to provide a theoretical framework for understanding mixed attitudes toward algorithmic advice and offers practical implications for framing algorithm use in organizations.
Additional Information
- Source:Service Science (INFORMS). 2025/06, Vol. 17, Issue 2/3, p74
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Social Sciences and Humanities
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:2164-3962
- DOI:10.1287/serv.2023.0054
- Accession Number:187997058
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Service Science (INFORMS) is the property of INFORMS: Institute for Operations Research & the Management Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.