JOURNAL ARTICLE
Co-rumination and depression: A systematic review and future directions.
Published In: Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 2025, v. 44, n. 1. P. 29 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Badawi, Jessica C.; Ingram, Rick E. 3 of 3
Abstract
Introduction: Literature on risk for depression largely focuses on intrapersonal risk factors, especially rumination, yet identifying interpersonal behaviors that increase negative affect may have important implications for understanding depression and risk for depression. Co-rumination is an explicitly interpersonal process that entails extensive and repetitive discussion of problems and associated negative affect within a dyad. Co-rumination has been well documented in depression, and may have important implications for understanding the disorder, but to date there has been no systematic review of the co-rumination literature, making it difficult to ascertain how co-rumination might be related to depression, and possibly to depression vulnerability. Method: Accordingly, we present a systematic review and appraisal of the literature on co-rumination, with suggestions for future research. Results: Co-rumination appears associated with depression risk across development through stress generation, parent-child interactions, and depression contagion. Existing research is consistent with the field's current understanding of several depression vulnerability factors, but additional research is needed to replicate and extend these findings. Discussion: Our review suggests that among the multitude of variables associated with risk for depression, co-rumination may deserve a prominent place. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology. 2025/02, Vol. 44, Issue 1, p29
- Document Type:Literature Review
- Subject Area:Social Sciences and Humanities
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:0736-7236
- DOI:10.1521/jscp.2025.44.1.002
- Accession Number:183628116
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology is the property of Guilford Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.