JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Trump administration says some approved childhood vaccines need better studies. Scientists disagree: Rationale for dropping some vaccine recommendations faces skepticism.

Published In: Sciencemag.org, 2026. P. N.PAG 1 of 3
Database: Applied Science & Technology Source Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Cohen, Jon 3 of 3

Abstract

The article discusses the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) decision to reduce the number of recommended childhood vaccines from 17 to 11, citing a need for more rigorous scientific evidence, particularly for vaccines against hepatitis A, influenza, and meningococcal disease. The CDC's assessment, which has faced skepticism from many scientists, argues that some vaccines lack proper placebo-controlled trials, while critics assert that existing vaccines have been proven safe and effective. The article highlights the ongoing debate about vaccine efficacy, safety data, and the ethical implications of conducting new trials, emphasizing the importance of vaccination in preventing serious diseases despite the CDC's revised recommendations. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

Source:Sciencemag.org. 2026/01, pN.PAG
Document Type:Article
Subject Area:Social Sciences and Humanities
Publication Date:2026
Accession Number:190801794
Copyright Statement:Copyright of Sciencemag.org is the property of American Association for the Advancement of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.