Rebalancing social & personality psychology methods: The case for naturalistic observation.

Published In: Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 2024, v. 18, n. 1. P. 1 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Robbins, Megan L.; Jonnalagadda, Pavani; Spahr, Chandler M. 3 of 3

Abstract

Though naturalistic observation methods are lauded for their utility, they are often neglected in social and personality psychology research. This paper describes evidence of the absence of naturalistic observation methods in our field, and some historical roots of this methodological imbalance in social/personality (SP) psychology. The paper then provides an overview of existing naturalistic observation methods relevant to SP psychology, describes various types of barriers to conducting such research, and concludes with recommendations for overcoming these barriers to produce a more well-rounded science. It is time to rebalance SP psychological methods by valuing and investing in naturalistic observation research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

Source:Social & Personality Psychology Compass. 2024/01, Vol. 18, Issue 1, p1
Document Type:Article
Subject Area:Social Sciences and Humanities
Publication Date:2024
ISSN:1751-9004
DOI:10.1111/spc3.12917
Accession Number:175350087
Copyright Statement:Copyright of Social & Personality Psychology Compass is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.