Guidance and Considerations When Performing Data‐Validity Checks.
Published In: Child Development, 2025, v. 96, n. 3. P. 947 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Cimpian, Joseph R.; Timmer, Jennifer D.; Kim, Taek H. 3 of 3
Abstract
This response to a Commentary by Delgado‐Ron, Jeyabalan, Watt, and Salway (2024) on Cimpian, Timmer, and Kim's (2023) paper discusses and clarifies some key issues in applying the new data‐validity sensitivity analysis proposed by Cimpian et al. (2023). The differences in the applications of the method by Delgado‐Ron et al. (2024) and Cimpian et al. (2023) present an opportunity to recognize the possibilities of this method, while also noting some challenges and limitations. This response‐commentary focuses on five key areas: (1) surmising a set of likely motivations of the survey respondents, (2) selecting the screener items, (3) considering the outcomes examined, (4) reflecting on null results in a sensitivity analysis, and (5) recognizing the advantages and disadvantages of the ease of this new method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Child Development. 2025/05, Vol. 96, Issue 3, p947
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Social Sciences and Humanities
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:0009-3920
- DOI:10.1111/cdev.14221
- Accession Number:184767926
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Child Development is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.