JOURNAL ARTICLE

Paradoxical anonymity, power relations, and appearance policing on r/instagramreality.

  • Published In: Sociological Forum, 2025, v. 40, n. 2. P. 250 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Furl, Katherine 3 of 3

Abstract

Appearances are unequally policed in gendered, racialized, and classist systems of power. Technological affordances, or the actions possible across different technological platforms, shape how these practices transpire online. Affordances can operate in gendered, racialized ways: the same platform capabilities can produce different use patterns depending on social contexts, uniquely reinforcing inequalities. I bridge a gap in sociological research by considering how technological affordances, alongside broader social contexts, shape oppositions, reproductions, or complications of dominant appearance norms. Reddit, a platform divided into standalone communities called subreddits, affords protective anonymity to historically disempowered groups, potentially facilitating resistance toward dominant norms. Paradoxically, Reddit's anonymity can foster toxicity and morally motivated harassment maintaining powerful groups' advantages. How do users on r/instagramreality, a subreddit calling out others' supposedly disingenuous, embodied social media self‐presentations, use Reddit's anonymity to challenge, complicate, or re‐entrench dominant norms of appearance? Applying qualitative content analysis to r/instagramreality posts, I find that while r/instagramreality users directly challenge and indirectly complicate constraining beauty standards, subreddit conversations also uphold norms privileging dominant groups. R/instagramreality assigns default morality to Whiteness, disproportionately criticizes women, and attributes morality through classist stereotypes. This study reveals how online anonymity, embodied self‐presentation, and surveillance coexist and operate across social contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Sociological Forum. 2025/06, Vol. 40, Issue 2, p250
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0884-8971
  • DOI:10.1111/socf.13058
  • Accession Number:185938954
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Sociological Forum is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.