JOURNAL ARTICLE

Forensic Neuropsychological Foundations in Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations.

  • Published In: Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2025, v. 40, n. 2. P. 256 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Tussey, Chriscelyn; Lacritz, Megan; Arredondo, Beth C; Marcopulos, Bernice 3 of 3

Abstract

This article focuses on the role of neuropsychological assessment in competency to stand trial (CST) evaluations, emphasizing how cognitive and brain-based conditions can affect an individual’s ability to participate in legal proceedings. It outlines relevant legal standards, the involvement of neuropsychologists in assessing cognitive capacities and symptom validity, and the importance of culturally sensitive approaches. The article highlights common conditions impacting CST, including traumatic brain injury (TBI), intellectual disability (ID), and dementia, illustrating each with detailed case examples that demonstrate neuropsychological evaluation’s practical application. It concludes by underscoring the growing need for specialized forensic neuropsychological expertise to support accurate, effective, and equitable CST assessments and restoration efforts within the justice system.

Additional Information

  • Source:Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2025/03, Vol. 40, Issue 2, p256
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0887-6177
  • DOI:10.1093/arclin/acae084
  • Accession Number:184297353
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.