JOURNAL ARTICLE

Right to Strike Advisory Proceedings: Some Procedural Aspects.

  • Published In: Chinese Journal of International Law, 2025, v. 24, n. 1. P. 1 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Kuc, Oktawian; Gapsa, Miłosz 3 of 3

Abstract

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is currently considering an advisory opinion on the right to strike, requested by the International Labour Organization (ILO). The proceedings involve a unique focus on accelerating the process and allowing participation from employers' and workers' organizations. The ICJ's approach to including non-governmental organizations in advisory proceedings is under scrutiny, with a distinction made between written statements and written contributions. The outcome of the oral proceedings will shed light on the extent of participation for these organizations. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:Chinese Journal of International Law. 2025/03, Vol. 24, Issue 1, p1
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:1540-1650
  • DOI:10.1093/chinesejil/jmaf003
  • Accession Number:184348968
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Chinese Journal of International Law is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.