Different while being similar: The dual institutional process and differential organizational status.
Published In: British Journal of Sociology, 2023, v. 74, n. 2. P. 241 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Zhao, Wei; Ge, Jianhua 3 of 3
Abstract
Connecting the neoinstitutional theory with Bourdieu's field theory, we develop a framework on the dual institutional process of integration and differentiation in a field. While the neoinstitutional theory has focused on similar organizational structures, we shift the research focus to offer an institutional explanation of differential organizational status. Drawing insights from Bourdieu's theory and key concepts, we highlight that the very institutional mechanisms causing isomorphism—regulative forces, normative pressures, and cognitive processes—also generate systematic status differentiation among organizations via their different levels of capital, homologous structures, and various habitus in a field. Our extended framework has theoretical significance in advancing the neoinstitutional theory, the research of status in organizational and economic sociology, and the Bourdieusian perspective. By theorizing status differentiation among organizations, it also adds an important dimension to enrich our understanding of multilevel status and social hierarchies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:British Journal of Sociology. 2023/03, Vol. 74, Issue 2, p241
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Sociology
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:0007-1315
- DOI:10.1111/1468-4446.12996
- Accession Number:162166601
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of British Journal of Sociology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.