JOURNAL ARTICLE
The relevance of Marshall's thought today: from methodological eclecticism to his sociological outlook.
Published In: Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2025, v. 49, n. 3. P. 405 1 of 3
Database: Business Source Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Pietrini, Filippo 3 of 3
Abstract
This article examines Alfred Marshall's philosophical foundations, focusing on his cognitive theory, methodological eclecticism, and sociological outlook, particularly as revealed in his lecture on American industry. It highlights Marshall's dualistic theory of mind, inspired by contemporaneous physiology and Cambridge mathematical intuitionism, which distinguishes between automatic patterns (cerebellum) and inventive reasoning (cerebrum), and connects this to his approach to economic modeling and social evolution. The paper also explores Marshall's synthesis of influences from William Whewell, Hegel, and Henry Maine, emphasizing his view of economic science as a "reasoned history" shaped by the reciprocal and causally intertwined relationship between industry and character. Furthermore, it identifies Marshall as a precursor to the sociology of knowledge through his recognition of unconscious social norms and everyday practices as formative of individual character and social reality, thus offering insights relevant to contemporary epistemological and social scientific debates.
Additional Information
- Source:Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2025/05, Vol. 49, Issue 3, p405
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Sociology
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:0309-166X
- DOI:10.1093/cje/beae045
- Accession Number:186989438
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Cambridge Journal of Economics is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.