JOURNAL ARTICLE

Institutional logics in the open science practices of university–industry research collaboration.

  • Published In: Science & Public Policy (SPP), 2023, v. 50, n. 5. P. 905 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Lattu, Annina; Cai, Yuzhuo 3 of 3

Abstract

The article examines how the open science (OS) movement influences university–industry research collaboration (UIRC) by identifying the norms and beliefs of key actors involved in OS practices, specifically open access (OA) publishing and open data sharing. Using institutional logics theory, the study analyzes two Finnish UIRC case studies and identifies six institutional logics shaping OS practices: state, market, corporation, profession, traditional trust–based community, and sustainability-based community logics. The state, profession, corporation, and sustainability-based community logics support OS, while market and traditional trust–based community logics hinder it, with the strongest tensions occurring between state and market logics and between profession and market logics. The study suggests that sustainability-based community logic may help reconcile these tensions and offers policy recommendations to strengthen pro-OS logics in UIRC contexts.

Additional Information

  • Source:Science & Public Policy (SPP). 2023/10, Vol. 50, Issue 5, p905
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Sociology
  • Publication Date:2023
  • ISSN:0302-3427
  • DOI:10.1093/scipol/scad037
  • Accession Number:173587998
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Science & Public Policy (SPP) is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.