NCAA vs Everyone: Will NIL End Collegiate Athletics?
Published In: Young Lawyer, 2024. P. 1 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Moore, Nadia 3 of 3
Abstract
The article discusses the NCAA's interim policy on name, image, and likeness (NIL) introduced on July 1, 2021, allowing collegiate athletes to profit from their NIL while prohibiting "pay for play." Following this policy, several antitrust lawsuits, including Grant House v. NCAA, Hubbard v. NCAA, and Carter v. NCAA, were filed by athletes seeking compensation for lost NIL opportunities. A proposed settlement plan, which included back pay and a revenue-sharing model, faced scrutiny from Judge Claudia Wilken, who raised concerns about the implications for athlete earnings and Title IX compliance. The article highlights ongoing legal challenges and the evolving landscape of athlete compensation in collegiate sports. [Extracted from the article]
Additional Information
- Source:Young Lawyer. 2024/10, p1
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Sports and Leisure
- Publication Date:2024
- ISSN:1090-6878
- Accession Number:186361478
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Young Lawyer is the property of American Bar Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.