Statutory Construction: A Supreme Court Twist on Deflategate?

  • Published In: Probate & Property, 2024, v. 38, n. 6. P. 64 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Parthemer, Mark R. 3 of 3

Abstract

The article discusses the US Supreme Court's decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which ended Chevron deference, a practice of deferring to agencies' interpretations of statutes. The case involved the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and the addition of Atlantic herring fisheries to a list of fisheries required to pay for government observers. The article draws parallels between the Court's decision and a family's decision to expand their rules for "Family Sundays." The Court's ruling in Loper emphasizes the importance of statutory construction and limits the use of agency rules and regulations as a political tool. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:Probate & Property. 2024/11, Vol. 38, Issue 6, p64
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Sports and Leisure
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:0164-0372
  • Accession Number:181239610
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Probate & Property is the property of American Bar Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.