JOURNAL ARTICLE

A brief description of the woodblock prints of the "Naxi Pictographs and Geba Script Comparative Lexicon" in the Lijiang Museum collection.

  • Published In: Journal of Chinese Writing Systems, 2024, v. 8, n. 4. P. 270 1 of 3

  • Database: Humanities Source Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Mu, Chen 3 of 3

Abstract

This article focuses on the historical significance and cultural context of the "Naxi Pictographs and Geba Script Comparative Lexicon," a set of woodblock prints preserved by the Lijiang Museum that represent the only existing woodblock prints of the Naxi script and are classified as national third-class cultural relics. The lexicon was part of a 20th-century movement led by Dongba ritualists, notably He Siquan and He Xuedao, to standardize and unify the Naxi pictographic script and the syllabic Geba script, both used by the Naxi people in Lijiang Basin. Despite partial completion and the carving of woodblocks, the project was interrupted by He Siquan’s death and subsequent social upheavals, leaving the unification unfinished. The article also examines the linguistic features of the scripts, the cultural and social challenges faced by the Dongba ritualists, and the broader historical printing traditions of Lijiang that framed this unique effort to transition a pictographic script into woodblock printing.

Additional Information

  • Source:Journal of Chinese Writing Systems. 2024/12, Vol. 8, Issue 4, p270
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Visual Arts
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:25138502
  • DOI:10.1177/25138502241298959
  • Accession Number:181986604
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Chinese Writing Systems is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.