JOURNAL ARTICLE

Joan Robinson and the reconstruction of economic theory.

  • Published In: Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2023, v. 47, n. 5. P. 883 1 of 3

  • Database: Business Source Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Martins, Nuno Ornelas 3 of 3

Abstract

The article focuses on Joan Robinson's late-career project to reconstruct economic theory by integrating insights from classical political economy, Marx, Keynes, Kalecki, and Sraffa, emphasizing distribution and historical time over marginalist equilibrium analysis. Robinson rejected the Marshallian framework and marginal productivity theory, arguing that income distribution is exogenous and shaped by social, political, and institutional forces rather than by supply and demand equilibrium. Her reconstruction centers on a circular process of socio-economic reproduction where prices and quantities are determined to sustain this reproduction under given distributional conventions, with historical time—characterized by irreversible, path-dependent processes and fundamental uncertainty—contrasted against reversible, model-based logical time. The synthesis she envisioned, often termed the Kaleckian–Keynesian–Sraffian approach, highlights the role of effective demand, mark-up pricing, and the conflict between capital and labor, while challenging traditional equilibrium models and advocating for a methodology grounded in conventions and social practices.

Additional Information

  • Source:Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2023/09, Vol. 47, Issue 5, p883
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Women's Studies and Feminism
  • Publication Date:2023
  • ISSN:0309-166X
  • DOI:10.1093/cje/bead018
  • Accession Number:173433045
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Cambridge Journal of Economics is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.