Setting our boundaries: The role of gender, values, and role salience in work–home boundary permeability.

  • Published In: Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 2024, v. 97, n. 3. P. 1076 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Amirkamali, Faezeh; Casper, Wendy J.; Hyde, Shelia A.; Wayne, Julie Holliday; Vaziri, Hoda 3 of 3

Abstract

Although women make up nearly half of the U.S. workforce, gender role stereotypes persist, and gender roles may relate to how men and women manage work–home boundaries. In this study, we explore gender differences in how employee values (tradition, achievement) translate into role identity salience, and in turn, boundary management preferences and behaviour. With data collected in two waves from 200 employees, we examined how the personal values of tradition and achievement relate differently by gender to role identity salience and in turn, boundary management. We found that men who more strongly value tradition have higher levels of work identity salience and both prefer and create an impermeable boundary around work to prevent intrusion from home. Men who valued tradition more also preferred and crafted a permeable home boundary to allow work intrusion. In contrast, women with higher tradition values reported higher home identity salience, which was associated with preferring segmentation in both work‐to‐home and home‐to‐work directions, and to behaviorally protecting home from work. Contrary to expectations, achievement values did not relate to a boundary management process via role identity salience for either gender. We discuss implications for a more nuanced, values‐driven, and gendered perspective on boundary management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology. 2024/09, Vol. 97, Issue 3, p1076
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Women's Studies and Feminism
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:0963-1798
  • DOI:10.1111/joop.12498
  • Accession Number:178835454
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.