JOURNAL ARTICLE
Not a Priority: Infertile Women and the Symbolic Politics of IVF in 1980s Britain.
Published In: Gender & History, 2023, v. 35, n. 3. P. 1111 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Beers, Laura 3 of 3
Abstract
This article considers the early debates over state funding for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment following the birth of Louise Brown in 1978 as a lens through which to re‐evaluate attitudes towards womanhood, maternity and sexuality in 1980s Britain. The state's reluctance to devote resources to IVF reflected, in no small part, the financial imperatives on an overstretched National Health Service. Beyond financial considerations, the question of IVF funding sparked deeply gendered debates over the politics and social significance of motherhood and mothering, and the state's role in family planning and maternal and child welfare. In short, debates over IVF operated as a form of symbolic politics. Stakeholders – including patients' advocates, women's associations, feminist activists and religious leaders – drew a clear link between the female body and the body politic and sought to articulate a policy towards both IVF treatment and infertile women more broadly that reflected their understanding of women's place within modern British society. Despite holding widely divergent views about gender, sexuality and motherhood, women's and religious groups found common ground in opposing state funding of IVF. This coalition facilitated the state's decision not to prioritise funding for IVF even as neighbouring countries, including Germany and France, embraced the procedure to help combat demographic decline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Gender & History. 2023/10, Vol. 35, Issue 3, p1111
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Women's Studies and Feminism
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:0953-5233
- DOI:10.1111/1468-0424.12630
- Accession Number:172756086
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Gender & History is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.