JOURNAL ARTICLE
Chego Trouble: Mark Catesby and the Frictions of Representation in Colonial Entomology.
Published In: Eighteenth Century: Theory & Interpretation, 2024, v. 65, n. 1/2. P. 71 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Myers, Jacob 3 of 3
Abstract
The article examines the complexities surrounding the representation of the chego, or Tunga penetrans, in the context of colonial entomology, particularly through the work of naturalist Mark Catesby. It highlights how the chego, a small flea notorious for infesting the feet of enslaved workers in the Caribbean, posed significant challenges for colonial naturalists attempting to categorize and understand it. The text discusses Catesby's efforts to depict the chego in his "Natural History of Carolina, Florida and the Bahama Islands," noting that his representations often failed to accurately convey the insect's characteristics and the ecological realities of colonial life. Furthermore, the article critiques Catesby's omission of Indigenous and Afro-Caribbean knowledge regarding the management of chego infections, revealing how colonial narratives marginalized these contributions while reinforcing racialized perspectives on labor and suffering in the plantation economy. [Extracted from the article]
Additional Information
- Source:Eighteenth Century: Theory & Interpretation. 2024/03, Vol. 65, Issue 1/2, p71
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Zoology
- Publication Date:2024
- ISSN:0193-5380
- DOI:10.1353/ecy.2024.a961702
- Accession Number:186818290
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Eighteenth Century: Theory & Interpretation is the property of University of Pennsylvania Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.