RESEARCH STARTER
Journalism reviews
Journalism reviews are publications dedicated to the critique and analysis of media practices, functioning as both watchdogs and commentators on the press. Emerging around 1900, these reviews address issues of censorship, including self-censorship among contributors and editorial decisions that may limit diverse perspectives. They often explore how business interests can exert influence over media content, suggesting that corporate ownership plays a significant role in shaping journalistic integrity. Despite the potential for criticism to be met with resistance from media entities, these reviews aim to hold the press accountable and promote ethical standards. Prominent examples include the Columbia Journalism Review and Extra!, among others, which contribute to the dialogue around media performance and societal responsibility. Although concerns exist regarding the implications of such critiques on press freedom, many argue that journalism reviews serve as a necessary counterbalance to ensure transparency and honesty in reporting. Overall, these publications play a crucial role in fostering a more informed public discourse.
Published In: 2023 1 of 2
- Related Articles:Am I in the centre of the story? Binaural sound used in audio and radio journalism: A systematic literature review.;Book Review: Effective Journalism: How the Information Ecosystem Works and What Journalists Should Do About It by Jessica Roberts.;Censorship and safety concerns cloud China's plans to host science journalism conference: Organizers of the 2029 World Conference of Science Journalists defend Beijing meeting as opportunity to connect with Chinese scientists.;The Conversation Canada and Journalistic Boundaries: A Case Study in the Challenges of Defining Journalism.;The roles and ethics of journalism: A comparative study of journalistic cultures in two student cohorts.
2 of 2
Full Article
DEFINITION: Periodicals specializing in coverage of journalism issues
SIGNIFICANCE: As watchdogs of journalism, these reviews have historically been a minor force for and against subtle forms of censorship
If there is a censorship continuum running from complete suppression to absolute freedom, the experience of journalism reviews as forces for—and victims of—censorship probably falls in the middle, according to insiders and observers. Journalism reviews, as press-criticism publications, began around 1900. At that time, they were a slight censorship factor as a result of their influencing or chilling press performance, and a censorship casualty as a result of suffering limited access to sources and pressures from the trade they covered.
According to Staci Kramer, a member of the advisory board of the St. Louis Journalism Review, censorship issues that journalism reviews deal with are self-censorship and editing. Kramer has pointed out that contributors to journals censor themselves because they think certain information or points of view may offend someone or because they anticipate cuts by an editor. Editors, as every contributor discovers, do make cuts, for all sorts of reasons—style, content, taste, and substance— and that can anger contributors. It is debatable whether such edits are overt censorship. More troubling, according to Kramer, is the occasional practice of newspapers telling journalists that they cannot contribute articles to a journalism review, or of newspapers prohibiting a source from talking to a review reporter.
Commerce also can be a force for censorship, according to the head of a self-described anti-censorship organization, the media watchdog group, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR), which publishes the journalism review Extra! According to FAIR member Jeff Cohen, the main culprits of censorship in North American society are the corporations that own the media. According to Cohen, censorship in the media is caused less by government or religion than by business interests.
The market for criticism by journalism reviews is limited. Tom Goldstein’s Killing the Messenger: 100 Years of Media Criticism (1989) argues that the media respond to criticism as positively as any other large institution. George Seldes, who from 1940 to 1950 published the respected journalism review In Fact, said that press critics can hold the news media accountable, but that it is not easy. According to Seldes, the critic can help keep the press honest. Newspapers, he argues, “like kings, pretend they can do no wrong.”
Journalism reviews and press critics have included a series of magazine articles and books by Will Irwin and Upton Sinclair in the early twentieth century, and the New Yorker column “The Wayward Press,” launched in 1928 by editor Robert Benchley. According to H. Eugene Goodwin in Groping for Ethics in Journalism (1983), journalists have resisted critical appraisals out of concern that such appraisals might diminish press freedom. In the United States, there is no systematic audit of the performance of the press or of the fulfillment of its duty to keep the public informed about vital national issues.
A list of late twentieth-century US journalism reviews includes Accuracy in Media Report, American Journalism Review, Columbia Journalism Review, Extra!, Forbes MediaCritic, Lies of Our Times, Media Culture Review, and St. Louis Journalism Review (later renamed as the Gateway Journalism Review). Although some fear that a review organization of the news media would be the first step toward censorship, Kramer, the St. Louis Journalism Review reporter and editor, has argued that censorship by or upon journalism reviews is rare. Rather, reviews have functioned as a conscience within the news industry.
Bibliography
“British Journalism Review.” Sage Journals, journals.sagepub.com/home/BJR. Accessed 5 May 2026.
Columbia Journalism Review, www.cjr.org. Accessed 5 May 2026.
“George Seldes, The Last Great Muckraker, Never Tired of Protesting Even at 104.” New England Historical Society, 2022, newenglandhistoricalsociety.com/george-seldes-last-great-muckraker-never-tired-protest/. Accessed 5 May 2026.
Sulzberger, A. G. “Journalism’s Essential Value.” The New York Times Company, 24 May 2023, www.nytco.com/press/journalisms-essential-value. Accessed 5 May 2026.
“2025 at Columbia Journalism School: Year in Review.” Columbia Journalism School, 19 Dec. 2025, journalism.columbia.edu/news/2025-year-review. Accessed 4 May 2026.
Full Article
DEFINITION: Periodicals specializing in coverage of journalism issues
SIGNIFICANCE: As watchdogs of journalism, these reviews have historically been a minor force for and against subtle forms of censorship
If there is a censorship continuum running from complete suppression to absolute freedom, the experience of journalism reviews as forces for—and victims of—censorship probably falls in the middle, according to insiders and observers. Journalism reviews, as press-criticism publications, began around 1900. At that time, they were a slight censorship factor as a result of their influencing or chilling press performance, and a censorship casualty as a result of suffering limited access to sources and pressures from the trade they covered.
According to Staci Kramer, a member of the advisory board of the St. Louis Journalism Review, censorship issues that journalism reviews deal with are self-censorship and editing. Kramer has pointed out that contributors to journals censor themselves because they think certain information or points of view may offend someone or because they anticipate cuts by an editor. Editors, as every contributor discovers, do make cuts, for all sorts of reasons—style, content, taste, and substance— and that can anger contributors. It is debatable whether such edits are overt censorship. More troubling, according to Kramer, is the occasional practice of newspapers telling journalists that they cannot contribute articles to a journalism review, or of newspapers prohibiting a source from talking to a review reporter.
Commerce also can be a force for censorship, according to the head of a self-described anti-censorship organization, the media watchdog group, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR), which publishes the journalism review Extra! According to FAIR member Jeff Cohen, the main culprits of censorship in North American society are the corporations that own the media. According to Cohen, censorship in the media is caused less by government or religion than by business interests.
The market for criticism by journalism reviews is limited. Tom Goldstein’s Killing the Messenger: 100 Years of Media Criticism (1989) argues that the media respond to criticism as positively as any other large institution. George Seldes, who from 1940 to 1950 published the respected journalism review In Fact, said that press critics can hold the news media accountable, but that it is not easy. According to Seldes, the critic can help keep the press honest. Newspapers, he argues, “like kings, pretend they can do no wrong.”
Journalism reviews and press critics have included a series of magazine articles and books by Will Irwin and Upton Sinclair in the early twentieth century, and the New Yorker column “The Wayward Press,” launched in 1928 by editor Robert Benchley. According to H. Eugene Goodwin in Groping for Ethics in Journalism (1983), journalists have resisted critical appraisals out of concern that such appraisals might diminish press freedom. In the United States, there is no systematic audit of the performance of the press or of the fulfillment of its duty to keep the public informed about vital national issues.
A list of late twentieth-century US journalism reviews includes Accuracy in Media Report, American Journalism Review, Columbia Journalism Review, Extra!, Forbes MediaCritic, Lies of Our Times, Media Culture Review, and St. Louis Journalism Review (later renamed as the Gateway Journalism Review). Although some fear that a review organization of the news media would be the first step toward censorship, Kramer, the St. Louis Journalism Review reporter and editor, has argued that censorship by or upon journalism reviews is rare. Rather, reviews have functioned as a conscience within the news industry.
Bibliography
“British Journalism Review.” Sage Journals, journals.sagepub.com/home/BJR. Accessed 5 May 2026.
Columbia Journalism Review, www.cjr.org. Accessed 5 May 2026.
“George Seldes, The Last Great Muckraker, Never Tired of Protesting Even at 104.” New England Historical Society, 2022, newenglandhistoricalsociety.com/george-seldes-last-great-muckraker-never-tired-protest/. Accessed 5 May 2026.
Sulzberger, A. G. “Journalism’s Essential Value.” The New York Times Company, 24 May 2023, www.nytco.com/press/journalisms-essential-value. Accessed 5 May 2026.
“2025 at Columbia Journalism School: Year in Review.” Columbia Journalism School, 19 Dec. 2025, journalism.columbia.edu/news/2025-year-review. Accessed 4 May 2026.
More Like ThisRelated Articles
Related Articles (5)
Related Articles (5)
- Am I in the centre of the story? Binaural sound used in audio and radio journalism: A systematic literature review.Published In: Radio Journal: International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media, 2024, v. 22, n. 2. P. 187Authored By: Paiva, Ana SofiaPublication Type: Academic Journal
- Book Review: Effective Journalism: How the Information Ecosystem Works and What Journalists Should Do About It by Jessica Roberts.Published In: Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 2024, v. 101, n. 4. P. 1061Authored By: Wennerström, ElisabethPublication Type: Academic Journal
- Censorship and safety concerns cloud China's plans to host science journalism conference: Organizers of the 2029 World Conference of Science Journalists defend Beijing meeting as opportunity to connect with Chinese scientists.Published In: Sciencemag.org, 2026. P. N.PAGAuthored By: King, AnthonyPublication Type: Periodical
- The Conversation Canada and Journalistic Boundaries: A Case Study in the Challenges of Defining Journalism.Published In: Canadian Journal of Communication, 2025, v. 50, n. 1. P. 115Authored By: Blanchett, Nicole; Ono, Sara; Lecourt, S.; Hillis, CalvinPublication Type: Academic Journal
- The roles and ethics of journalism: A comparative study of journalistic cultures in two student cohorts.Published In: Australian Journalism Review, 2024, v. 46, n. 2. P. 213Authored By: Lim, Louisa; Smy, Lucy; Sparrow, Jeff; Lo, Li-ChiaPublication Type: Academic Journal