RESEARCH STARTER

Strip and surface mining

Strip and surface mining are methods of extracting minerals and coal by removing overlying rock and soil. These techniques allow access to resources found in narrow seams that underground mining might not reach, offering a potentially safer and more cost-effective option for miners. However, these methods significantly alter landscapes, disrupt ecosystems, and pose environmental hazards such as water pollution and habitat destruction. Open-pit mining, a common type of surface mining, gradually deepens and widens to expose mineral deposits, while strip mining typically involves removing layers of overburden and replacing them in the voids created by previous operations.

A more specialized form, mountaintop removal, employs explosives to clear mountainsides, often displacing entire ecosystems and burying streams. The environmental repercussions of these mining practices have sparked debates about economic benefits versus ecological costs, particularly as regulations vary by region. While surface mining is integral to modern industrial society's resource needs, it raises critical questions concerning sustainability and equitable resource management, especially in areas with fragile environments. Understanding these complexities is vital for anyone interested in the intersections of industry, environment, and community health.

Full Article

DEFINITION: Mining methods in which rock and soil are removed to enable extraction of the substance being mined

Surface-mining methods make possible the extraction of minerals and coal from narrow seams that could not feasibly be mined using underground techniques. These methods, however, cause many different forms of damage to the environment, radically changing landscapes, blocking streams, destroying habitats, and polluting waterways.

Humans have long scraped away the surface of the land to get at the minerals and other materials underneath. For centuries this type of mining created scars on the landscape but rarely did major harm to the environment. In the twentieth century, however, surface mines became much larger and began to cause lasting environmental degradation. In some cases surface mining is the only feasible way to extract very narrow seams of coal or minerals. In addition, surface mining tends to be less hazardous for miners than underground mining and requires fewer and often less skilled workers, reducing costs. Massive surface mining is a characteristic of modern industrial society.

Open-Pit Mining

Minerals have long been mined using underground tunnels, but it is often more feasible to remove the dirt and rocks covering mineral deposits—the overburden—to get at them. In some cases the ore grade is so low that extensive treatment with crushers and chemicals (such as the cyanide leach process used with gold) is required. Open-pit mines are gradually expanded and deepened over time. The sides of such a mine are cut in a spiral, with benches ringing the sides so that trucks can access the material at the bottom of the pit. As the mine is deepened, seepage often becomes a problem, requiring pumping or other forms of water control to keep the mine from filling with water.

Shallow open-pit mines, often called quarries, are used to extract granite, limestone, gypsum, and clay. Some gemstones, such as diamonds, are mined in open pits such as was done in Kimberley, South Africa. Copper, nickel, iron ore, gold, and uranium are some of the minerals mined in this fashion. One of the largest open-pit mines in the world, the Hull-Rust-Mahoning Mine in Hibbing, Minnesota, has been in operation since 1895. This iron mine is 4.8 kilometers (3 miles) long, 3.2 kilometers (2 miles) wide, and 163 meters (535 feet) deep.

Starting during the early twentieth century, large open-pit copper mines began to be opened in the American West. One of the earliest was the Bingham Canyon Mine in Utah, which has been in operation since 1906. The pit of this mine covers 770 hectares (1,900 acres) and is 1.2 kilometers (0.75 miles) deep and 4 kilometers (2.5 miles) wide. By the early twenty-first century the mine had produced more than 17 million tons of copper, 190 million ounces (about 5.3 trillion grams) of silver, 23 million ounces (about 652 million grams) of gold, and 850 million pounds (about 385 million kilograms) of molybdenum.

Bingham Canyon Mine is the largest human-made excavation in the world, but other copper mines are also quite large, such as the Chuquicamata in Chile, the Nchanga mines in Zambia, and the Grasberg mine in Indonesia. Although copper is a major product of these mines, some also produce other minerals, such as gold and silver. The Grasberg mine is the largest gold mine and one of the largest copper mines in the world. Other open-pit mines, such as Kumtor in Kyrgyzstan, produce gold and uranium. Massive open-pit mines are also found in Russia, Australia, Canada, Peru, Mongolia, and Namibia. Some of these mines exist in environmentally fragile surroundings; Kumtor, for instance, is more than 4,000 meters (14,000 feet) above sea level on a high plateau, and Grasberg is located on a mountaintop near rare equatorial glaciers and in a region subject to earthquakes that produce large landslides.

Open-pit mining produces several environmental hazards. The overburden removed at an open-pit mine, which often contains hazardous chemicals, must be placed nearby. As the mine expands, it consumes nearby land. The Berkeley Pit, for example, consumed several neighborhoods in Butte, Montana. In addition, processing the material taken from an open-pit mine often involves treating it with acid, which leads to extensive runoff. The acidic runoff, dissolved copper, and other materials from processing at the Grasberg mine, for example, wash into two rivers that are the water sources for several communities, and some of it ultimately reaches the ocean, a situation that persists long after mines are closed.

When mining operations cease at an open-pit mine, the pit often fills with groundwater and precipitation, forming an acidic lake contaminated with metals; the Berkeley Pit in Butte, Montana, is a well-known example. The mine, opened in 1955 and closed in 1982, has filled with acidic water containing heavy metals such as arsenic and cadmium, copper, and other metals, with a pH of about 2.5. In 1983 the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated the Berkeley Pit a Superfund site, triggering long-term remediation obligations. A water-diversion and treatment system was established to keep contaminated pit water from entering local groundwater supplies. Since 2019, water has been actively pumped and treated to prevent the pit from reaching its critical level. As of 2025, remediation, water-treatment, and monitoring efforts remained ongoing under EPA supervision.

Strip Mining

The process of mining shallow deposits of coal and tar sands often involves the removal of the overburden. In the most common form of strip mining, the overburden is removed and placed in the excavation left by the previous strip. Contour mining involves removing land along the contour of the land and usually produces terraces on a mountainside. Massive pieces of equipment are used in strip mining, such as draglines, which remove the surface layer, and earthmovers, often two stories tall, which move the surface or coal.

Coal is strip-mined around the world. In the United States strip mining is used to remove surface coal seams in all parts of the country. The largest US strip mines are found in the Powder River basin in northeast Wyoming and southeastern Montana. Unlike coal in other parts of the country, such as West Virginia, the Powder River coal lies close to the surface. The Powder River coal deposits are some of the largest in the world. In May 2024, the Biden administration issued a decision to end new federal coal leasing in the Powder River Basin due to environmental and public health concerns. However, a federal court blocked the ban later that year, requiring the Bureau of Land Management to reconsider leasing in its resource management plans. As of 2025, no new leases have been issued, existing mines continued to operate, and the final status of coal leasing in the basin remained under legal and administrative review.

As energy companies seek new sources of petroleum, oil-impregnated sands—known as oil sands or tar sands—are increasingly viewed as viable resources. Rising oil prices in the twenty-first century have made large-scale extraction economically attractive. One of the world’s largest concentrations of oil sands lies in the Athabasca River Basin in Alberta, Canada, where strip mining has expanded significantly. These operations disturb fragile boreal ecosystems and require substantial energy and water to process the bitumen, raising ongoing environmental concerns.

Mountaintop Removal

A variant on surface mining for coal that has come to be adopted in parts of West Virginia, Kentucky, and southern Ohio is mountaintop removal, a mining method in which explosives are used on mountainsides to remove the overburden, which is then pushed into adjoining valleys. This approach allows miners to reach deeper into the earth than does conventional strip mining. In some cases not only are whole mountains removed but also the remaining earth is excavated.

Mountaintop removal drastically changes landscapes as whole mountains are destroyed and valleys are filled with overburden. Streams are often buried in the process, and sometimes large lakes are created in what remains of the valleys; the water in such lakes is highly acidic and contains heavy metals. Critics of mountaintop removal point out that the plant and animal species that live in mountain valleys, some of which are quite rare, are endangered by this mining method. In parts of West Virginia and Kentucky the environment has been changed permanently as mountains have been leveled by mining. In the Appalachia region mountaintop removal has damaged the water sources of several communities. In addition, the explosions that are part of this kind of mining can be dangerous to local people and structures, and the sulfur compounds in the dust created by the explosions pose a health hazard.

The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 requires mine operators to restore surface-mined land to its approximate original contour, but mountaintop removal mining typically proceeds under variances that allow the land to be left as large, flat plateaus. Because the mountaintops cannot be reconstructed, full restoration is not possible, and the resulting landscapes differ dramatically from their pre-mining form. Some reclaimed sites have been converted into golf courses, airports, industrial parks, or other developments, although many reclaimed areas remain underutilized or face long-term environmental challenges.

Mining and Industrial Progress

Access to coal and to minerals such as copper and gold is essential for modern industrial society. Achieving this access cheaply is also an important ingredient for economic development. In some cases access helps to reduce environmental problems, such as the strip mining of the Powder River basin’s low-sulfur coal to replace high-sulfur coal and reduce emissions of sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere. Some surface-mining approaches seem to be the only economically feasible way of acquiring certain minerals or energy sources that are essential to industrial society.

Nonetheless, a significant drawback to surface mining is the extensive environmental degradation that often occurs during the mining process and after mines cease operations. In addition to the environmental damage posed by mining itself, many sites where deposits of desirable minerals or coal are located are heavily timbered and must be cleared before mining can begin; such deforestation destroys plant and animal habitats, contributes to global warming, and leads to soil erosion. Mining companies often opt for the cheapest approaches to resource extraction, even though these approaches may produce higher levels of environmental harm than other approaches.

Some countries have placed extensive regulations on surface mining of all kinds, with the aim of limiting the environmental damage such mining can do, whereas regulations in other nations are minimal. In the United States, the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act requires that owners of surface mine sites reclaim the land at least to some degree when mining has ended. Other laws limit the damage that mining operations are allowed to do to streams and endangered species. Debates are ongoing, however, regarding how effective these laws have been, especially since the presidential administration of George W. Bush weakened the application of some of the laws.

However, countries vary widely in their regulation of surface mining. Australia enforces some of the world’s most comprehensive requirements, mandating detailed environmental assessments, progressive land rehabilitation, financial assurance bonds, and long-term monitoring to ensure that mined areas are restored to stable conditions. By contrast, Indonesia’s regulatory framework is comparatively weak in practice; despite laws requiring reclamation, enforcement is limited, and many abandoned surface mines remain unreclaimed, contributing to deforestation, water contamination, and persistent environmental hazards.

The societal dilemma posed by surface mining is that such mining is essential for economic progress yet often results in environmental harm. Further, the costs of this harm are not always shared equitably—industrialized nations frequently profit from surface mining that is conducted in developing countries, which often bear most of the costs of the environmental damage.


Bibliography

"Biden Administration to End Coal Leasing in Powder River Basic." Earth Justice, 16 May 2024, earthjustice.org/press/2024/biden-administration-to-end-coal-leasing-in-powder-river-basin. Accessed 23 July 2024.

"Energy Regulatory Framework in Indonesia." Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Republic of Indonesia, Aug. 2023, ger-idn.energyhub.id/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/20230816_Energy-Regulatory-Framework-Booklet-V.2_REEP2.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec. 2025.

"Fact Sheet: Biden-⁠Harris Administration Takes Further Action to Strengthen and Secure Critical Mineral Supply Chains." The White House, 20 Sept. 2024, bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/09/20/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-takes-further-action-to-strengthen-and-secure-critical-mineral-supply-chains/. Accessed 10 Dec. 2025.

Goodell, Jeff. Big Coal: The Dirty Secret behind America’s Energy Future. Houghton Mifflin, 2006.

LeCain, Timothy J. Mass Destruction: The Men and Giant Mines That Wired America and Scarred the Planet. Rutgers UP, 2009.

Lei, Wulin, et al. "Parameter Design and Effectiveness Evaluation of Wide Strip Mining of Extra Thick Coal Seams Under Dense Buildings." Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 10037, 2 May 2024, doi:10.1038/s41598-024-60719-x. Accessed 23 July 2024.

Lynch, Martin. Mining in World History. Reaktion Books, 2002.

McKay, Brett. "Strip Mining to Be Allowed under Alberta's New Coal Rules." St. Albert Gazette, 14 Jan. 2025, www.stalbertgazette.com/local-news/strip-mining-to-be-allowed-under-albertas-new-coal-rules-10015264. Accessed 10 Dec. 2025.

McQuaid, John. “Mining the Mountains.” Smithsonian, Jan. 2009, pp. 74–85.

"Mine Rehabilitation." Department of Industry, Science, and Resources, Australian Government, Sept. 2016, www.industry.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-04/lpsdp-mine-rehabilitation-handbook-english.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec. 2025.

Montrie, Chad. To Save the Land and People: A History of Opposition to Surface Coal Mining in Appalachia. U of North Carolina P, 2003.

Power, Thomas Michael. Lost Landscapes and Failed Economies: The Search for a Value of Place. Island Press, 1996.

Shnayerson, Michael. Coal River. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2008.

Full Article

DEFINITION: Mining methods in which rock and soil are removed to enable extraction of the substance being mined

Surface-mining methods make possible the extraction of minerals and coal from narrow seams that could not feasibly be mined using underground techniques. These methods, however, cause many different forms of damage to the environment, radically changing landscapes, blocking streams, destroying habitats, and polluting waterways.

Humans have long scraped away the surface of the land to get at the minerals and other materials underneath. For centuries this type of mining created scars on the landscape but rarely did major harm to the environment. In the twentieth century, however, surface mines became much larger and began to cause lasting environmental degradation. In some cases surface mining is the only feasible way to extract very narrow seams of coal or minerals. In addition, surface mining tends to be less hazardous for miners than underground mining and requires fewer and often less skilled workers, reducing costs. Massive surface mining is a characteristic of modern industrial society.

Open-Pit Mining

Minerals have long been mined using underground tunnels, but it is often more feasible to remove the dirt and rocks covering mineral deposits—the overburden—to get at them. In some cases the ore grade is so low that extensive treatment with crushers and chemicals (such as the cyanide leach process used with gold) is required. Open-pit mines are gradually expanded and deepened over time. The sides of such a mine are cut in a spiral, with benches ringing the sides so that trucks can access the material at the bottom of the pit. As the mine is deepened, seepage often becomes a problem, requiring pumping or other forms of water control to keep the mine from filling with water.

Shallow open-pit mines, often called quarries, are used to extract granite, limestone, gypsum, and clay. Some gemstones, such as diamonds, are mined in open pits such as was done in Kimberley, South Africa. Copper, nickel, iron ore, gold, and uranium are some of the minerals mined in this fashion. One of the largest open-pit mines in the world, the Hull-Rust-Mahoning Mine in Hibbing, Minnesota, has been in operation since 1895. This iron mine is 4.8 kilometers (3 miles) long, 3.2 kilometers (2 miles) wide, and 163 meters (535 feet) deep.

Starting during the early twentieth century, large open-pit copper mines began to be opened in the American West. One of the earliest was the Bingham Canyon Mine in Utah, which has been in operation since 1906. The pit of this mine covers 770 hectares (1,900 acres) and is 1.2 kilometers (0.75 miles) deep and 4 kilometers (2.5 miles) wide. By the early twenty-first century the mine had produced more than 17 million tons of copper, 190 million ounces (about 5.3 trillion grams) of silver, 23 million ounces (about 652 million grams) of gold, and 850 million pounds (about 385 million kilograms) of molybdenum.

Bingham Canyon Mine is the largest human-made excavation in the world, but other copper mines are also quite large, such as the Chuquicamata in Chile, the Nchanga mines in Zambia, and the Grasberg mine in Indonesia. Although copper is a major product of these mines, some also produce other minerals, such as gold and silver. The Grasberg mine is the largest gold mine and one of the largest copper mines in the world. Other open-pit mines, such as Kumtor in Kyrgyzstan, produce gold and uranium. Massive open-pit mines are also found in Russia, Australia, Canada, Peru, Mongolia, and Namibia. Some of these mines exist in environmentally fragile surroundings; Kumtor, for instance, is more than 4,000 meters (14,000 feet) above sea level on a high plateau, and Grasberg is located on a mountaintop near rare equatorial glaciers and in a region subject to earthquakes that produce large landslides.

Open-pit mining produces several environmental hazards. The overburden removed at an open-pit mine, which often contains hazardous chemicals, must be placed nearby. As the mine expands, it consumes nearby land. The Berkeley Pit, for example, consumed several neighborhoods in Butte, Montana. In addition, processing the material taken from an open-pit mine often involves treating it with acid, which leads to extensive runoff. The acidic runoff, dissolved copper, and other materials from processing at the Grasberg mine, for example, wash into two rivers that are the water sources for several communities, and some of it ultimately reaches the ocean, a situation that persists long after mines are closed.

When mining operations cease at an open-pit mine, the pit often fills with groundwater and precipitation, forming an acidic lake contaminated with metals; the Berkeley Pit in Butte, Montana, is a well-known example. The mine, opened in 1955 and closed in 1982, has filled with acidic water containing heavy metals such as arsenic and cadmium, copper, and other metals, with a pH of about 2.5. In 1983 the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated the Berkeley Pit a Superfund site, triggering long-term remediation obligations. A water-diversion and treatment system was established to keep contaminated pit water from entering local groundwater supplies. Since 2019, water has been actively pumped and treated to prevent the pit from reaching its critical level. As of 2025, remediation, water-treatment, and monitoring efforts remained ongoing under EPA supervision.

Strip Mining

The process of mining shallow deposits of coal and tar sands often involves the removal of the overburden. In the most common form of strip mining, the overburden is removed and placed in the excavation left by the previous strip. Contour mining involves removing land along the contour of the land and usually produces terraces on a mountainside. Massive pieces of equipment are used in strip mining, such as draglines, which remove the surface layer, and earthmovers, often two stories tall, which move the surface or coal.

Coal is strip-mined around the world. In the United States strip mining is used to remove surface coal seams in all parts of the country. The largest US strip mines are found in the Powder River basin in northeast Wyoming and southeastern Montana. Unlike coal in other parts of the country, such as West Virginia, the Powder River coal lies close to the surface. The Powder River coal deposits are some of the largest in the world. In May 2024, the Biden administration issued a decision to end new federal coal leasing in the Powder River Basin due to environmental and public health concerns. However, a federal court blocked the ban later that year, requiring the Bureau of Land Management to reconsider leasing in its resource management plans. As of 2025, no new leases have been issued, existing mines continued to operate, and the final status of coal leasing in the basin remained under legal and administrative review.

As energy companies seek new sources of petroleum, oil-impregnated sands—known as oil sands or tar sands—are increasingly viewed as viable resources. Rising oil prices in the twenty-first century have made large-scale extraction economically attractive. One of the world’s largest concentrations of oil sands lies in the Athabasca River Basin in Alberta, Canada, where strip mining has expanded significantly. These operations disturb fragile boreal ecosystems and require substantial energy and water to process the bitumen, raising ongoing environmental concerns.

Mountaintop Removal

A variant on surface mining for coal that has come to be adopted in parts of West Virginia, Kentucky, and southern Ohio is mountaintop removal, a mining method in which explosives are used on mountainsides to remove the overburden, which is then pushed into adjoining valleys. This approach allows miners to reach deeper into the earth than does conventional strip mining. In some cases not only are whole mountains removed but also the remaining earth is excavated.

Mountaintop removal drastically changes landscapes as whole mountains are destroyed and valleys are filled with overburden. Streams are often buried in the process, and sometimes large lakes are created in what remains of the valleys; the water in such lakes is highly acidic and contains heavy metals. Critics of mountaintop removal point out that the plant and animal species that live in mountain valleys, some of which are quite rare, are endangered by this mining method. In parts of West Virginia and Kentucky the environment has been changed permanently as mountains have been leveled by mining. In the Appalachia region mountaintop removal has damaged the water sources of several communities. In addition, the explosions that are part of this kind of mining can be dangerous to local people and structures, and the sulfur compounds in the dust created by the explosions pose a health hazard.

The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 requires mine operators to restore surface-mined land to its approximate original contour, but mountaintop removal mining typically proceeds under variances that allow the land to be left as large, flat plateaus. Because the mountaintops cannot be reconstructed, full restoration is not possible, and the resulting landscapes differ dramatically from their pre-mining form. Some reclaimed sites have been converted into golf courses, airports, industrial parks, or other developments, although many reclaimed areas remain underutilized or face long-term environmental challenges.

Mining and Industrial Progress

Access to coal and to minerals such as copper and gold is essential for modern industrial society. Achieving this access cheaply is also an important ingredient for economic development. In some cases access helps to reduce environmental problems, such as the strip mining of the Powder River basin’s low-sulfur coal to replace high-sulfur coal and reduce emissions of sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere. Some surface-mining approaches seem to be the only economically feasible way of acquiring certain minerals or energy sources that are essential to industrial society.

Nonetheless, a significant drawback to surface mining is the extensive environmental degradation that often occurs during the mining process and after mines cease operations. In addition to the environmental damage posed by mining itself, many sites where deposits of desirable minerals or coal are located are heavily timbered and must be cleared before mining can begin; such deforestation destroys plant and animal habitats, contributes to global warming, and leads to soil erosion. Mining companies often opt for the cheapest approaches to resource extraction, even though these approaches may produce higher levels of environmental harm than other approaches.

Some countries have placed extensive regulations on surface mining of all kinds, with the aim of limiting the environmental damage such mining can do, whereas regulations in other nations are minimal. In the United States, the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act requires that owners of surface mine sites reclaim the land at least to some degree when mining has ended. Other laws limit the damage that mining operations are allowed to do to streams and endangered species. Debates are ongoing, however, regarding how effective these laws have been, especially since the presidential administration of George W. Bush weakened the application of some of the laws.

However, countries vary widely in their regulation of surface mining. Australia enforces some of the world’s most comprehensive requirements, mandating detailed environmental assessments, progressive land rehabilitation, financial assurance bonds, and long-term monitoring to ensure that mined areas are restored to stable conditions. By contrast, Indonesia’s regulatory framework is comparatively weak in practice; despite laws requiring reclamation, enforcement is limited, and many abandoned surface mines remain unreclaimed, contributing to deforestation, water contamination, and persistent environmental hazards.

The societal dilemma posed by surface mining is that such mining is essential for economic progress yet often results in environmental harm. Further, the costs of this harm are not always shared equitably—industrialized nations frequently profit from surface mining that is conducted in developing countries, which often bear most of the costs of the environmental damage.


Bibliography

"Biden Administration to End Coal Leasing in Powder River Basic." Earth Justice, 16 May 2024, earthjustice.org/press/2024/biden-administration-to-end-coal-leasing-in-powder-river-basin. Accessed 23 July 2024.

"Energy Regulatory Framework in Indonesia." Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Republic of Indonesia, Aug. 2023, ger-idn.energyhub.id/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/20230816_Energy-Regulatory-Framework-Booklet-V.2_REEP2.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec. 2025.

"Fact Sheet: Biden-⁠Harris Administration Takes Further Action to Strengthen and Secure Critical Mineral Supply Chains." The White House, 20 Sept. 2024, bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/09/20/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-takes-further-action-to-strengthen-and-secure-critical-mineral-supply-chains/. Accessed 10 Dec. 2025.

Goodell, Jeff. Big Coal: The Dirty Secret behind America’s Energy Future. Houghton Mifflin, 2006.

LeCain, Timothy J. Mass Destruction: The Men and Giant Mines That Wired America and Scarred the Planet. Rutgers UP, 2009.

Lei, Wulin, et al. "Parameter Design and Effectiveness Evaluation of Wide Strip Mining of Extra Thick Coal Seams Under Dense Buildings." Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 10037, 2 May 2024, doi:10.1038/s41598-024-60719-x. Accessed 23 July 2024.

Lynch, Martin. Mining in World History. Reaktion Books, 2002.

McKay, Brett. "Strip Mining to Be Allowed under Alberta's New Coal Rules." St. Albert Gazette, 14 Jan. 2025, www.stalbertgazette.com/local-news/strip-mining-to-be-allowed-under-albertas-new-coal-rules-10015264. Accessed 10 Dec. 2025.

McQuaid, John. “Mining the Mountains.” Smithsonian, Jan. 2009, pp. 74–85.

"Mine Rehabilitation." Department of Industry, Science, and Resources, Australian Government, Sept. 2016, www.industry.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-04/lpsdp-mine-rehabilitation-handbook-english.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec. 2025.

Montrie, Chad. To Save the Land and People: A History of Opposition to Surface Coal Mining in Appalachia. U of North Carolina P, 2003.

Power, Thomas Michael. Lost Landscapes and Failed Economies: The Search for a Value of Place. Island Press, 1996.

Shnayerson, Michael. Coal River. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2008.

More Like ThisRelated Articles

Related Articles (5)

Related Articles (5)