Social rearticulation

The concept of social rearticulation has a complex intellectual history that originated in classical political economy, was informed by Italian intellectual Antonio Gramsci, and in the late twentieth century, found voice in the work of sociologists Michael Omi and Howard Winant. According to Omi and Winant, social rearticulation is the “discursive reorganization or reinterpretation of ideological themes and interests already present in subjects’ consciousness, such that these elements obtain new meanings or coherence.” In practice, social rearticulation involves the dual process of disorganizing “dominant ideologies”—the values of the dominant group—and constructing “oppositional cultures”—cultures that are different from the dominant culture but that reflect or react to the society around them.

96397678-97100.jpg

Dominant ideologies can be reorganized in various ways. However, to be termed social rearticulation, the process must involve the imparting of new knowledge to established traditions and norms and the recombination of preexisting meanings with new conceptions of social identities. Examples of preexisting systems and beliefs being reformulated can be found not only in social movements but also in popular and intellectual discourse. Therefore, social rearticulation is quintessentially a political process, a way of destabilizing, reorganizing, and initiating civil and state reform. As a social construct, its trajectory is complex, uneven, and marked by considerable instability and tension. However, as a way to break away from cultural and political predecessors, social rearticulation is an important sociohistorical process in which racial and social categories are created, inhabited, and transformed.

In the context of race, social rearticulation refers to the process of social justice that aims to redefine the social construct of race and reinterpret racial identities. Race is a dynamic social construct that changes with political, cultural, and social shifts. For example, the Civil Rights Movement rearticulated the meaning of being a Black American, giving a voice to the marginalized group and restructuring society’s perspective.

Bibliography

Castro, Eliana. ““How Every Black Man Should Be”: Historical Narrative Construction as Identity Rearticulation.” Journal of Social Studies Research, vol. 47, no. 1, 2023, pp. 40–55, doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2022.01.006. Accessed 20 Dec. 2024.

Chalcraft, John, and Yaseen Noorani. Introduction. Counterhegemony in the Colony and Postcolony. Edited by Chalcraft and Noorani, Palgrave, 2007, pp. 1–19.

Craig, Maxine Leeds. “Ridicule and Celebration: Black Women as Symbols in the Rearticulation of Race.” Ain’t I a Beauty Queen?: Black Women, Beauty, and the Politics of Race, 2002, doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152623.003.0001. Accessed 20 Dec. 2024.

HoSang, Daniel Martinez, et al., editors. Racial Formation in the Twenty-First Century. U of California P, 2012.

Omi, Michael, and Howard Winant. Racial Formation in the United States. 3rd ed., Routledge, 2015.

Small, Stephen. Racialised Barriers: The Black Experience in the United States and England in the 1980s. Routledge, 1994.

Visweswaran, Kamala. Un/common Cultures: Racism and the Rearticulation of Cultural Difference. Duke UP, 2010.