Right-to-work law

In the United States, federal law prohibits "closed shops," or unions that require employers to hire only union employees. However, the government leaves legislation regarding other types of unions and union security measures to the states. Right-to-work laws, or RTW laws, are state laws affirming an individual's right to refuse to join or support, through the payment of dues, a labor union. Further, under the legal principle of exclusive representation, all employees—including those who refuse to join or contribute to a union—have the right to union representation against an employer in cases involving their maltreatment. In addition, non-dues-paying employees enjoy the same privileges, such as higher salaries and better benefits, as the dues-paying members of a union. RTW laws, which have been enacted in roughly half of the states in the country, aims to empower individuals and weaken the collective bargaining power of unions.

Brief History

Labor unions have existed in the United States since the mid-nineteenth century. These organizations advocate on behalf of workers to improve working conditions, raise salaries, and increase benefits. Labor unions give workers collective bargaining power against their employers. Labor agreements between unions and employers, however, had no legal backing until 1935. That year, Congress passed the National Labor Relations Act (known as the NLRA, or the Wagner Act), which strengthened union power by permitting all types of unions.

In 1947, Congress passed the Labor-Management Relations Act (known as the Taft-Hartley Act), which weakened the Wagner Act by outlawing closed shops that required employers to hire only union members. Taft-Hartley continued to permit union shops, which allow employers to hire anyone but require new employees to join the union within a certain time frame. However, the act allowed states to pass laws prohibiting these and other types of unions.

Following the passage of the Taft-Hartley Act, a number of states began to pass what became known as right-to-work laws, which made union shops illegal as well. These laws, the first of which appeared in Florida, outlawed compulsory union membership. They allow employees to maintain the protections and privileges guaranteed by union contracts even if they refuse to join the union or pay dues to support it. Today, about half the states in the country have instituted RTW laws, but these laws have generated heated debate between advocates and critics.

Support for RTW Laws

Advocates point out that in states without RTW laws, employees may refuse to join a union but may still have to pay fees associated with collective bargaining. Supporters of RTW laws believe that this is a violation of an employee's personal rights and freedoms. RTW laws make both compulsory union membership and compulsory union dues illegal—that is, union membership and/or contribution of union dues may not be used as a condition of employment. Employees may choose to join and contribute to unions, but they do not have to do so. Furthermore, under federal law, unions must provide non-dues-paying employees the same protections and benefits as dues-paying union members.

Opponents often claim that RTW laws are anti-union, but advocates argue that the laws are neither anti- nor pro-union. Supporters claim that unions have become too big and powerful and often use their power to influence Congress rather than to benefit union members. RTW laws simply return some power to the individual. By granting individuals the power to withhold union dues, they say, RTW laws make it necessary for unions to work harder on behalf of employees to earn their support.

Individuals and organizations who support RTW laws argue that citizens in states with RTW laws enjoy a higher standard of living than citizens in non-RTW states. They point to statistics showing that RTW states have experienced greater growth in manufacturing jobs than non-RTW states. In addition, they argue that RTW states experience lower rates of unemployment and higher personal incomes. For example, they cite numbers from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, which show that in the decade between 2001 and 2011, compensation for private-sector jobs in RTW states increased approximately four times as much as it did in non-RTW states. Additionally, in comparison to non-RTW states, RTW states tend to experience fewer work stoppages.

Despite several arguments, the landscape shifted when Michigan repealed its Right-to-Work statute on March 30, 2024, becoming the first state in fifty-eight years to do so. This move counters the pro-RTW narrative by allowing unions to require dues for all benefited employees. While Michigan pivoted toward union security, twenty-six states—mostly in the South and Midwest—still maintain RTW laws, ensuring the debate over labor freedom and economic growth continues.

Opposition to RTW Laws

Critics argue that RTW laws are anti-union because they undermine employment securities that labor unions have worked to achieve. For this reason, critics have dubbed RTW laws "right-to-work-for-less" laws. They believe that without strong unions to protect employees' interests, employers in RTW states will reduce wages and benefits, such as paid vacation and healthcare. They argue that the reason for the growth in manufacturing jobs in RTW states is because manufacturers relocate to places without union protection so they can pay lower wages.

Opponents also point out that states with RTW laws spend less on education than non-RTW states. They point to statistics showing that RTW states have lower wages and incomes, less comprehensive health insurance coverage, and higher rates of poverty. They argue that because unions often take the lead in advocating better hours and improved working conditions, RTW laws actually make it easier for employers to mistreat employees. For example, they cite data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics showing that the rate of workplace deaths is 54 percent higher in RTW states than in states without such laws.

Bibliography

Forbath, William E. “Right-to-Work Laws.” Dictionary of American History, 3rd ed., edited by Stanley I. Kutler, vol. 7, Charles Scribner's Sons, 2003, p. 161.

Gould, Elise, and Will Kimball. “‘Right-to-Work’ States Still Have Lower Wages.” Economic Policy Institute, 22 Apr. 2015, www.epi.org/publication/right-to-work-states-have-lower-wages/. Accessed 7 May 2026.

Keefe, Jeffrey H. “On Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association: The Inextricable Links between Exclusive Representation, Agency Fees, and the Duty of Fair Representation.” Economic Policy Institute, 2 Nov. 2015, www.epi.org/publication/on-friedrichs-v-california-teachers-association-the-inextricable-links-between-exclusive-representation-agency-fees-and-the-duty-of-fair-representation/. Accessed 7 May 2026.

“National Right to Work Act.” National Right to Work Committee, 27 Feb. 2023, nrtwc.org/facts-issues/national-right-to-work-act/. Accessed 7 May 2026.

Pasulka, Nicole. “Right-to-Work Laws Explained.” Mother Jones, 16 Mar. 2012, www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/03/what-are-right-to-work-laws. Accessed 7 May 2026.

“Right to Work.” AFL-CIO, 10 Mar. 2016, www.aflcio.org/Legislation-and-Politics/State-Legislative-Battles/Ongoing-State-Legislative-Attacks/Right-to-Work. Accessed 7 May 2026.

“Right to Work Frequently-Asked Questions.” National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, 10 Mar. 2016, www.nrtw.org/b/rtw_faq.htm. Accessed 7 May. 2026.

“Right to Work Laws.” Workplace Fairness, 10 Mar. 2016, www.workplacefairness.org/unions-right-to-work. Accessed 7 May 2026.

Scholz, Sally J. “Right to Work.” Encyclopedia of Business Ethics and Society, edited by Robert W. Kolb, vol. 4, SAGE Publications, 2008, pp. 1839–42.

“MI Repeal of FTW/RTW.” Labor and Economic Opportunity, www.michigan.gov/leo/bureaus-agencies/ber/michigan-employment-relations-commission/mi-repeal-of-ftw-rtw. Accessed 9 May 2026.

Tuzzo, Adam, et al. “Michigan Repeals Right-to-Work Law.” Littler, 29 Mar. 2023, www.littler.com/news-analysis/asap/michigan-repeals-right-work-law. Accessed 9 May 2026.

Wymer, John. “Michigan Repeals Right-to-Work Law.” Thompson Hine, 27 Mar. 2023, www.thompsonhine.com/insights/michigan-repeals-right-to-work-law/. Accessed 7 May 2026.