"Classless" society

Debates over the possibility of a classless society are central to the social scientific analysis of the nature of social inequality in general, specifically with regard to racial and ethnic relations. These scholarly debates have occurred within specific social contexts, reflecting larger political struggles between those who defend the alleged harmony and stability of the status quo and those who advocate social change toward the goal of equality. If, as many argue, a classless society is impossible—as all societies have had some level of inequality—then egalitarianism is utopian and misguided, and acceptance of existing inequities is more “realistic.” Critics of existing social orders, on the other hand, have generally argued that equality is both desirable and attainable, and the experience of innumerable preliterate societies is offered as anthropological evidence for the possibility of a classless society. In the social sciences, most theoretical traditions hold that social inequality, usually thought of in terms of “socioeconomic status” rather than class, exists in all societies and will presumably continue to exist in the future.

Social scientists who subscribe to structural functionalism define inequality in terms of “status” and, given the universality of status distinctions based on age and gender, argue that social stratification—the division of members of a society into hierarchical levels—is universal and necessary. According to this view, inequality in society serves to ensure that the most critical functions in society are performed by the most talented individuals. Society cannot do without inequality.

Sociobiologists, on the other hand, see social inequality as rooted in biology. Economic, racial, and gender inequalities are the function of variation in the genetic endowment of individuals. Those able to secure wealth, prestige, and power owe their success to the biological inheritance of intelligence, ambition, attractiveness, size, and other attributes. Because genetic variation within populations is universal, so too is social inequality.

Elitists argue that all societies require bureaucracies to conduct the affairs of state. The elite who occupy the command positions in these organizations had the means to preserve their position and privilege. Throughout history, when elites have been overthrown, they were simply replaced with a new elite. The necessity of elites, according to this argument, precluded the emergence of a classless society.

Marxists retain a concern with class, understood in an economic sense as a relationship to the means of production. Therefore, “class societies” are those in which a tiny minority owns the major means of production and the vast majority are dispossessed and pressed into the service of the propertied class. Societies of this kind appear in the historical record only within the last ten thousand years. Although status inequalities are more universal, this was not a basis for the denial of access to productive property in classless societies. Marxists argue that most of human history is the history of classless societies. The emergence of classless societies in the future is made possible by the efforts of capitalists to homogenize the vast majority of the world’s population.

Venezuela: Social Equality Achieved Through Poverty

The late twentieth and the early twenty-first centuries saw the advent of what could be described as a country with far reduced economic stratifications. This was the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, a socialist, autocratic regime installed by the late Hugo Chavez. If a classless society could be described as existing in Venezuela, it was largely because the national economic disaster engineered by the Venezuelan government had plunged the vast majority of its population into destitution. 

Chavez had been elected president in 1999 under a platform of utilizing Venezuela’s natural petroleum to elevate the poorer segments of Venezuelan society. He adopted increasingly socialistic economic policies and turned to populism to create a cult of personality to ensure his hold on political power. The Venezuelan government under Chavez could thrive only as long as the price of petroleum was high. During several economic downturns, the price of petroleum plummeted, and with it went the fortunes of Venezuela. Chavez's populist economic policies were never fiscally sound, and the impacts of his impetuous financial decision-making led to astronomically high rates of inflation. After Chavez died of cancer in 2013, his successor, Nicolás Maduro—a former bus driver—could only retain political power through fraud and authoritarianism. This was best exemplified by the 2024 Venezuelan presidential elections, where reporting showed that Maduro outright lost the elections by a wide margin. Venezuela had deteriorated under the combined leadership of Chavez and Maduro to the extent that it was routinely included in global listings of failed states. 

In the 2020s, because of Venezuela's cataclysmic fall, a sizable percentage of its population emigrated from the country. Hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans traveled to the United States on foot on the dangerous overland route through Central America and Mexico. For many Venezuelans, the United States, which Chavez described as his nemesis, served as their ultimate destination. In January 2026, the United States captured Maduro in a military operation and brought him to New York to face narco‑terrorism and related charges.

Bibliography

Albertus, Michael. "Chávez’s Real Legacy Is Disaster." Foreign Policy, 6 Dec. 2018, foreignpolicy.com/2018/12/06/chavezs-real-legacy-is-disaster. Accessed 8 Jan. 2026.

Benyon, Huw. "A Classless Society?" Patterns of Social Inequality: Essays for Richard Brown. Ed. Benyon and Pandeli Glavanis. 1999. Routledge, 2013. 36–53.

Fritsch, Matthias. "The Enlightenment Promise and Its Remains: Derrida and Benjamin on the Classless Society." Human Studies, vol. 25, no. 3, 2002, pp. 289–96.

Popper, Karl. The Open Society and Its Enemies. 1945. Introd. Alan Ryan. Princeton UP 2013.

Rosanvallon, Pierre. The Society of Equals. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Harvard UP, 2013.

Roy, Diana, and Amelia Cheatham. "Venezuela: The Rise and Fall of a Petrostate." Council on Foreign Relations, 31 July 2024, www.cfr.org/backgrounder/venezuela-crisis. Accessed 8 Jan. 2026.

Turkewitz, Julie, and Isayen Herrera. "Why Are So Many Venezuelans Going to the United States?" The New York Times, 24 Sept. 2023, www.nytimes.com/2023/09/24/world/americas/why-are-so-many-venezuelans-going-to-the-united-states.html. Accessed 8 Jan. 2026.

Weiss, Donald. The Specter of Capitalism and the Promise of a Classless Society. Humanities, 1993.

Zhuang, Yan, et al. “What We Know About Maduro's Capture and the Fallout.” The New York Times, 5 Jan. 2026, www.nytimes.com/2026/01/03/world/americas/venezuela-maduro-capture-trump.html. Accessed 8 Jan. 2026.