Positive ethnocentrism

For all humans, the very long and complex process of acquiring culture through socialization leads to the development of prejudices about other groups or cultures that are seen as different. Consequently, ethnocentrism is a general belief, and frequently a demonstrated practice, that one’s group or culture is superior to that of others.

96397583-96620.jpg96397583-97062.jpg

Ethnocentrism has both positive and negative functions. Positive ethnocentrism, as defined by sociologists Joe R. Feagin and Clairece Booher Feagin in the fifth edition of their textbook Racial and Ethnic Relations (1996), is “characterized by a loyalty to the values, beliefs, and members of [one’s] own group.” Positive ethnocentrism permits individuals to derive personal benefit from belonging to what they perceive as a superior group or culture and may also provide individuals with a particular identity, which otherwise they would not have. Positive ethnocentrism may also integrate an otherwise indistinct group, providing members with a strong sense of belonging, a sort of consciousness of kind, one that may even justify their sociopolitical actions against other groups.

The problem with positive ethnocentrism is that it may encourage and even become a rationale for attempting to change other groups by whatever means deemed necessary, even annihilation. Positive ethnocentrism does nothing to permit people to accept the ways of others whom they see as different. As an alternative, political sociologist Audrey Alejandro proposed the concept of balanced ethnocentrism, which emphasizes self-awareness and recognizing the limitations of personal biases that impact one’s view of other cultures. From a balanced ethnocentrism perspective, individuals should be open to learning about other cultures by practicing cultural relativism, be open to intercultural dialogue, and promote tolerance and diversity.

Bibliography

Alejandro, Audrey. “Eurocentrism, Ethnocentrism, and Misery of Position: International Relations in Europe – A Problematic Oversight.” European Review of International Studies, no. 1, p. 20, doi.org/10.3224/eris.v4i1.01. Accessed 2 Dec. 2024.

Feagin, Joe R., and Clairece Booher Feagin. Racial and Ethnic Relations. 5th ed., Prentice, 1996.

Feagin, Joe R., and Clairece Booher Feagin. Racial and Ethnic Relations. 10th ed., Pearson, 2019.

Gayles, Jonathan. “Anthropology, Afrocentricity, and African American Studies: Toward a Sincere Discipline.” Transforming Anthropology, vol. 16, no. 2, 2008, pp. 147–59, doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-7466.2008.00022.x. Accessed 2 Dec. 2024.

Keith, Kenneth D. “Ethnocentrism: Seeing the World from Where We Stand.” Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2019, pp. 23–38, doi.org/10.1002/9781119519348.ch2. Accessed 2 Dec. 2024.

Walker, Sheila S. “The Virtues of Positive Ethnocentrism: Some Reflections of an Afrocentric Anthropologist.” Transforming Anthropology, vol. 2, no. 2, 1991, pp. 23–26, doi.org/10.1525/tran.1991.2.2.23. Accessed 2 Dec. 2024.

Wells, Alan. “Towards a Non-Pathological View of Judgemental Attitudes: A Conceptual Analysis of Ethnocentrism, Xenophobia and Prejudice.” Race, vol. 12, no. 2, 1970, pp. 219–28, doi.org/10.1177/030639687001200206. Accessed 2 Dec. 2024.