Passenger Cases
Passenger Cases refer to a significant Supreme Court decision from February 7, 1849, concerning state taxation of immigrants arriving in the United States. The case arose when states like Massachusetts and New York imposed fees on ship captains for each incoming passenger, including immigrants and foreign visitors. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled, in a close 5-4 decision, that individual states lacked the authority to tax these immigrants or regulate commerce with foreign nations, invoking the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution. This ruling overturned previous precedents that had allowed such state taxation practices. The debate surrounding immigration and taxation remains relevant today, as discussions about the financial contributions of immigrants to the U.S. economy continue to surface in political discourse. Overall, the Passenger Cases highlight ongoing tensions between state authority and federal regulation over immigration and commerce.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Passenger Cases
THE CASE: United States (US) Supreme Court decision concerning state taxation on arriving immigrants
DATE: Decided on February 7, 1849
ALSO KNOWN AS: Norris v. Boston; Smith v. Turner
SIGNIFICANCE: Although the case’s theoretical foundations were notoriously unclear, in the Passenger Cases, the Supreme Court held that the individual states had no authority to tax immigrants entering the country, nor did they have the right to regulate commerce with foreign nations.
Massachusetts and New York enacted legislation that charged ships’ captains a fee for every incoming passenger, including immigrants and foreign visitors. When the issue reached the Supreme Court, the justices voted 5-4 to strike down the laws, overruling the New York v. Miln (1837) precedent. Among the eight separate and confusing opinions, at least three justices based their decision on the commerce clause of the US Constitution, which authorized Congress and not the states to regulate commerce with foreign nations. The two other justices in the majority appeared to base their decisions on other grounds. The four justices in the minority wanted to continue the Miln precedent, which had held that such fees were a legitimate application of the states’ police power. In subsequent rulings, particularly Henderson v. Mayor of the City of New York (1875), a firm majority of the Court would unambiguously rule that the commerce clause prohibited the states from imposing head taxes or bonds on passengers from other countries. Although there have been no cases concerning this issue in the twenty-first century, the topic of immigration and taxation remains a dominant subject in public and political discourse. Discussion on the tax burden shouldered by immigrants, who are responsible for paying US taxes regardless of their legal status, and the broader economic impacts of immigration on the nation remain highly discussed and debated.
Bibliography
Berkowsky, Juan. "Do Immigrants Pay Taxes In USA?" Urbina Immigration Law, 24 June 2024, urbinalawfirm.com/en/immigrants-pay-taxes-in-usa. Accessed 31 Aug. 2024.
Chuman, Frank. The Bamboo People: The Law and Japanese Americans. Del Mar, Calif.: Publisher’s Inc., 1976.
Itō, Kazuo. Issei: A History of Japanese Immigrants in North America. Seattle: Japanese Community Service, 1973.