The Facts by Philip Roth

First published: 1988

Type of work: Autobiography

Time of work: The 1930’s to the 1970’s

Locale: New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Chicago, New York, and Massachusetts

Principal Personages:

  • Philip Roth, a prominent Jewish-American novelist
  • Herman Roth, the author’s father, an insurance salesman
  • Bob and Charlotte Maurer, Roth’s faculty mentors at Bucknell University
  • Polly Bates, Roth’s girlfriend at Bucknell
  • Josie, Roth’s tormented and tormenting wife
  • May Aldridge, the wealthy, genteel woman with whom Roth spends five years

Form and Content

Though subtitled A Novelist’s Autobiography, The Facts does not attempt a complete chronology of Philip Roth’s works and days. Instead, it is a series of five retrospective sketches, each connected to a crucial stage in the growth of a well-known Jewish-American novelist. Roth begins with an account of his stable childhood in a lower-middle-class Newark, New Jersey, neighborhood where almost everyone was Jewish and his principal interest was baseball. His father, a sedulous insurance salesman denied advancement because of his company’s anti-Semitism, is presented more sympathetically than the fathers in Roth’s fiction. The next chapter, “Joe College,” is a memoir of initiation into a very different environment, the rural, Gentile campus of Bucknell University, where he began to cultivate literary and amorous interests. The section’s climax comes with Roth’s perverse decision to break with his girlfriend Polly Bates, though and because their relationship seemed idyllic.

non-sp-ency-lit-266115-148247.jpg

At the physical and emotional center of the book is Roth’s version of a disastrous marriage to the woman he calls Josie, though her real name—Margaret Martinson Williams—is public knowledge. A bibulous divorcee and mother of two children (whom she abandons), “this wretched small-town gentile paranoid” represented a denial of everything a “nice Jewish boy” was reared to respect. Yet, for all the turbulence of their relationship, Roth credits Josie as his diabolic inspiration, “the greatest creative-writing teacher of them all, specialist par excellence in the aesthetics of extremist fiction.”

“All in the Family” recounts the hostility Roth encountered among Jews when he began writing about them without flattery; he used that hostility as further fuel for his fiction. At the end of the final chapter, after the death of Josie in an automobile accident, Roth breaks with May Aldridge, the loving and loyal antithesis to his wife. Determined to be absolutely independent, he nevertheless recognizes that wish as a chimera. As Roth’s Nathan Zuckerman already discovered in The Counterlife (1987), every life implies a counterlife and the imagination is inextricably entangled in the facts.

Roth frames The Facts with meditations on his uncharacteristic project of writing about his own life. The book opens with a letter addressed to Zuckerman, a fictional character who appears in several of Roth’s novels and, himself a prominent Jewish-American novelist, is something of an alter ego for Roth. Roth explains to Zuckerman why he has now decided to dispense with his usual artifice of fictional surrogates in order to try to represent himself directly. “Is the book any good?” Roth asks. Zuckerman’s response, critical of Roth for being too discreet, too genial, devoid of the furious energy that empowers his finest fictions, comes in a thirty-four-page analysis that constitutes the final chapter of The Facts. It is hardly the last word on its prolific, obsessive author. Zuckerman’s bemusement over “the kind of stories that people turn life into, the kind of lives that people turn stories into,” a quotation from The Counterlife, provides a suitable epigraph to The Facts and to Roth’s entire career.

Critical Context

If Philip Roth had never written his distinctive fictions, few would probably be interested in his account of a not especially exceptional life away from books. Without the intense and widespread reaction that his stories have provoked, he certainly would never have written The Facts, a maligned and self-maligning author’s attempt to set the record straight by shaping it to fit the category of nonfiction. Just as Our Gang (1971) employed grotesque caricature in order to posit truths about the Nixon Administration and The Ghost Writer (1979) implausibly resurrected Anne Frank in New England in order to discover universal truths about the connections among suffering, love, and art, The Facts marshals verifiable data to create another of Roth’s troubled narratives.

Students of Roth’s career will likely be intrigued by correspondences between events in his life and episodes in his writing. In My Life As a Man (1974), for example, Peter Tarnopol is duped into marrying Maureen Johnson when she feigns pregnancy by borrowing the urine sample of a black woman she encounters in the park. In The Facts, Roth points out that the woman he calls Josie perpetrated virtually the same fraud on him. He claims, however, that this section of My Life As a Man was the most directly autobiographical of his fictions, because he simply could not imagine a more dramatic scenario: “Those scenes represent one of the few occasions when I haven’t spontaneously set out to improve on actuality in the interest of being more interesting.”

Beyond its clues about an author’s sources, The Facts is of interest as a documentation of Roth’s continuing interest in the question of what stance a novelist should adopt toward actuality—antagonism or servility? It is a product of the contemporary culture’s impatience with literary fabrication, the fascination with “true stories” that has accounted for the vogue of the “nonfiction novel” and for the fact that nonfiction regularly outsells fiction. Roth writes his novels with the autocensure of an instinctive witness, and he writes his autobiography with the aspirations of a novelist.

The Facts rehearses the quarrels familiar to readers of Roth’s stories and novels—with the suffocations of motherly love, with the animus of a Jewish establishment outraged at his refusal to be a communal cheerleader, with the refractory nature of women and preliterary life. The Facts appeared only a few months after Arthur Miller, another highly respected American Jewish writer, published Timebends (1987) and a few months before poet Karl Shapiro’s retrospective The Younger Son (1988). Jews are no longer insurgents challenging the peripheries of the literary establishment. Nevertheless, Roth’s autobiography is not a summation or celebration of his success. It is a pause, a somewhat uncharacteristically diplomatic way of pursuing by other means his war with the facts.

Bibliography

Bloom, Harold, ed. Philip Roth, 1986.

Booklist. LXXXIV, August, 1988, p. 1868.

Jones, Judith Paterson, and Guinevera A. Nance. Philip Roth, 1981.

Kirkus Reviews. LVI, August 15, 1988, p. 1225.

Lee, Hermione. Philip Roth, 1982.

Library Journal. CXIII, September 1, 1988, p. 170.

McDaniel, John N. The Fiction of Philip Roth, 1974.

The New Republic. CXCIX, November 21, 1988, p. 37.

The New York Review of Books. XXXV, October 13, 1988, p. 24.

The New York Times Book Review. XCIII, September 25, 1988, p. 3.

Newsweek. CXII, September 26, 1988, p. 72.

Pinsker, Sanford, ed. Critical Essays on Philip Roth, 1982.

Publishers Weekly. CCXXXIV, July 29, 1988, p. 213.

Rodgers, Bernard F., Jr. Philip Roth, 1978.

Solotaroff, Theodore. “The Journey of Philip Roth,” in The Atlantic Monthly. CCXXIII (April, 1969), pp. 64-72.

Time. CXXXII, September 19, 1988, p. 94.

The Wall Street Journal. CCXI, August 30, 1988, p. 17.

The Washington Post Book World. XVIII, August 28, 1988, p. 1.