Saracen Conquest

Also known as: Islamic conquest of Egypt; Muslim conquest of Egypt.

Date: 600-700 c.e.

Locale: Egypt

Background

The Muslim and Christian accounts of the conquest both imply that the Egyptians were at times partial to the Arabs because of continued conflict between the indigenous, monophysite Coptic Church and the orthodox Byzantine Church in Constantinople. Balādhurī and Ibn ՙAbd al-Ḥakam are the two main Islamic historians of the conquest of Egypt. Their accounts are supported in part by John of Nikiou, a Coptic bishop, who wrote a Christian chronicle that includes a short section presenting an Egyptian Christian perspective on the events.

Action

The conquest of Egypt was led by the general ՙAmr ibn al-ՙĀṣ, who led the battle for Egypt in the Delta region (639 c.e.) and negotiated for the surrender of Babylon (641/642 c.e.) and later for Alexandria (642 c.e.). Despite caliph ՙUmar ibn al-Khaṭtāb’s initial reluctance to support ՙAmr’s invasion, the general convinced the caliph of the value of extending Muslim control into Africa and issued a decisive defeat against the Byzantine emperor, Heraclius.

Consequences

The conquest of Egypt provided a dependable food supply that could sustain the needs of an emerging Islamic empire. Egypt’s proximity to Arabia proved useful for subsequent conquests into North Africa.

Bibliography

Butler, Alfred J. The Arab Conquest of Egypt. Brooklyn, N.Y.: A & B Publishing Group, 1992.

Donner, Fred M. The Early Islamic Conquests. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1981.