Megastudy

A megastudy is a very large-scale scientific research project that includes multiple researchers working in different locations with different groups of people as test subjects. Like other studies, it uses the scientific method and applies appropriate measures to help ensure the accuracy of the result. However, in a megastudy, researchers conduct similar scientific studies in different locations, then compile all the data they have gathered and analyze it to reach a conclusion. The main advantage to a megastudy is that it provides a larger pool of data from a wider variety of subjects, which can decrease the likelihood of reaching false conclusions and increase the accuracy of the findings.

rsspencyclopedia-20220830-24-192901.jpgrsspencyclopedia-20220830-24-192935.jpg

Overview

Mega comes from the Greek word megas, meaning great or large. Like smaller research studies, a megastudy uses established scientific processes for systematically collecting, interpreting, and evaluating information. The researchers determine the behavior, substance, effect, etc. to be studied, then decide the best way to go about gathering the information needed to draw a conclusion. Researchers then conduct their study, gather and record information, analyze what they have found, and reach a conclusion. This conclusion is then shared with others who could benefit from the information and/or the general public.

One of the problems with regular scientific studies is that they provide results on one group of subjects in one location at one point in time. This sometimes leads to results that are skewed by factors unique to those subjects or that area. For instance, physicians used to follow the same prescribing protocols for all of their patients with high blood pressure. Then they discovered that Black patients did not always have good results. Upon further research, physicians learned that this was due to genetic differences between ethnicities. This happened because the original drug testing did not include a wide range of ethnicities.

Megastudies help overcome problems like this. Megastudies combine the results of many teams of researchers working in different geographic areas. This creates a much larger and more varied pool of information, increasing the chances of getting accurate results. A megastudy can also provide quicker information. For instance, when the COVID-19 pandemic hit in 2020, there was little information about effective treatments. Physicians were using any medication or treatment that they thought might work. Researchers were able to quickly gather information about thousands of patients’ outcomes in a megastudy that helped narrow down the range of things that did and did not work.

There is no set number of participants for a megastudy, though most researchers agree they should include at least 5,000 individuals. This increases the likelihood of capturing a wide range of responses that will give a more accurate study conclusion. There are some problems with megastudies, however. One problem, especially with health-related megastudies, is that they generally rely on information gathered retrospectively from information recorded by medical practitioners as they are actively treating patients. This can result in errors caused by the way the patient’s condition was coded, oversights in noticing side effects, and other incorrect information that can skew the megastudy’s results.

Bibliography

Caparlar, Ceyda Özhan, and Aslı Dönmez. “What Is Scientific Research and How Can It Be Done?” Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Aug. 2016, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5019873/. Accessed 9 Feb. 2025.

Evans, Tony. “Most Experiments Don’t Work, and That’s OK.” Psychology Today, 12 Dec. 2021, www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/trust-games/202112/most-experiments-don-t-work-and-s-ok. Accessed 9 Feb. 2025.

Konkel, Lindsey. “Why Some of the World’s Most Important Medications Don’t Work for Minorities.” Newsweek, 6 Nov. 2015, wallacehouse.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Konkel.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb. 2025.

Kupferschmidt, Kai. “Remdesivir and Interferon Fall Flat in WHO's Megastudy of COVID-19 Treatments.” Science, 16 Oct. 2020, www.science.org/content/article/remdesivir-and-interferon-fall-flat-who-s-megastudy-covid-19-treatments. Accessed 9 Feb. 2025.

Micu, Alexandra. “Novel ‘Megastudy’ Approach Finds the Best Incentive to Keep People in the Gym.” ZME Science, 10 Dec. 2021, www.zmescience.com/science/megastudy-people-gym-incentives-83236264/. Accessed 9 Feb. 2025.

Nolen, R. Scott. “Ripple Effect of Megastudy Still Being Felt.” American Veterinary Medical Association, 15 July 2019, www.avma.org/javma-news/2019-07-15/ripple-effect-megastudy-still-being-felt. Accessed 9 Feb. 2025.

Raw, Robert M. M.D, et al. “The Overpowered Mega-study Is a New Class of Study Needing a New Way of Being Reviewed.” Anesthesiology, Jan. 2014, pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology/article/120/1/245/11737/The-Overpowered-Mega-study-Is-a-New-Class-of-Study. Accessed 9 Feb. 2025.

Yu, Lian et al. “Megastudies: A New Approach to Reducing Vaccine Hesitation Worldwide.” Vaccines vol. 11,1 133. 6 Jan. 2023, doi:10.3390/vaccines11010133. Accessed 9 Feb. 2025.