RESEARCH STARTER
Subordinate group
A subordinate group refers to a segment of society that experiences a structured inequality, which affects their access to resources, power, and opportunities. Unlike numerical minorities, the defining feature of subordinate groups is their disproportionate lack of access to societal wealth, education, employment, and adequate housing. These groups are often defined by characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion, and gender, and their status is determined by the dominant group within the society. The relationships between subordinate and dominant groups are maintained through various mechanisms, including ideological justifications for inequality and discriminatory practices. Ethnic subordinate groups are often singled out for cultural distinctions, while racial subordinate groups may be identified by perceived physical differences. Additionally, the concept of intersectionality highlights how multiple identities can impact the experiences of individuals within subordinate groups. The dynamics of these relationships are crucial for understanding broader social structures and the perpetuation of inequality.
Authored By: Schroer, Todd J. 1 of 4
Published In: 2022 2 of 4
- Related Topics:
3 of 4
- Related Articles:Ethno-Racial and Credit Worthiness Disparities in Access to Mortgage Credit.;Intersectional Disparities in Youth Tobacco Use by Sexual and/or Gender Minority Status and Race/Ethnicity.;Racial Inequality in Organizations: A Systems Psychodynamic Perspective.;Social Conflict and the Evolution of Unequal Conventions.;The Effects of In-Group Identity and Clarity of the Bonus Determination Criteria on Supervisors' Discretionary Bonus Adjustments: Field Evidence from China.
4 of 4
Full Article
The identification of subordinate groups is based on socially determined systems of structured inequality. These systems of societal stratification influence the control that members of different groups have over their lives, the power they wield, and their access to valued resources. Subordinate groups, sometimes called minority groups, are not determined by numerical size but by the fact that they do not share proportionately in societal wealth, educational attainment, suitable employment, adequate housing, and other socially valued resources. This stratification system is created and maintained through the actions of dominant groups who benefit from this unequal relationship. The important characteristics or traits that define membership in a subordinate group vary across time and place but are determined by the dominant group. The main categories of subordinate groups most often include those based on race, ethnicity, religion, and gender. Ethnic subordinate groups are singled out for their cultural differences from the dominant group’s cultural norms. Racial subordinate groups are distinguished by some perceived physical difference from the dominant group. In the intersectionality framework, multiple categories of subordinate groupings may interact. The tactics used by dominant groups to ensure their advantaged societal position include ideological rationalizations for inequality and discrimination based on prejudices, as well as repressive actions ranging from segregation to extermination.
Bibliography
Buhl, Sarah, et al. "Damned if She Does: The Subordinate Male Target Hypothesis and Discrimination of Social Dominant Female Minority Members." The British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 63, no. 3, 2024, pp. 1073-90, doi:10.1111/bjso.12716. Accessed 8 Jan. 2026.
Lewis, Daniel C. Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: A Critical Assessment of the Tyranny of the Majority in the American States. Routledge, 2013.
Rose, Peter I. They and We: Racial and Ethnic Relations in the United States and Beyond. 7th ed., Paradigm, 2014.
Rosette, Ashleigh Shelby, and Leigh Plunkett Tost. "Perceiving Social Inequality: When Subordinate-Group Positioning on One Dimension of Social Hierarchy Enhances Privilege Recognition on Another." Psychological Science, vol. 24, no. 8, 2013, pp. 1420–7.
Sarno, Elissa L., et al. "Intersectional Minority Stress and Identity Conflict among Sexual and Gender Minority People of Color Assigned Female at Birth." Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, vol. 27, no. 3, 2021, pp. 408-17, doi:10.1037/cdp0000412. Accessed 8 Jan. 2026.
"Six Negative Effects of the Systematic Subordination of Women." Columbia UP Blog, 12 Mar. 2020, cupblog.org/2020/03/12/six-negative-effects-of-the-systematic-subordination-of-women. Accessed 7 Jan. 2026.
Soen, Dan, et al., editors. Minority Groups: Coercion, Discrimination, Exclusion, Deviance and the Quest for Equality. Nova Science, 2012.
Wise, Tim J. Dear White America: Letter to a New Minority. City Lights, 2012.
Yetkili, O., et al. “The Effects of Identity (Subordinate vs. Superordinate) Salience on Intergroup Attitudes, Anxiety, and Contact Intentions in North Cyprus.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, vol. 31, no. 1, 2025, pp. 26–35, doi.org/10.1037/pac0000747. Accessed 8 Jan. 2026.
Full Article
The identification of subordinate groups is based on socially determined systems of structured inequality. These systems of societal stratification influence the control that members of different groups have over their lives, the power they wield, and their access to valued resources. Subordinate groups, sometimes called minority groups, are not determined by numerical size but by the fact that they do not share proportionately in societal wealth, educational attainment, suitable employment, adequate housing, and other socially valued resources. This stratification system is created and maintained through the actions of dominant groups who benefit from this unequal relationship. The important characteristics or traits that define membership in a subordinate group vary across time and place but are determined by the dominant group. The main categories of subordinate groups most often include those based on race, ethnicity, religion, and gender. Ethnic subordinate groups are singled out for their cultural differences from the dominant group’s cultural norms. Racial subordinate groups are distinguished by some perceived physical difference from the dominant group. In the intersectionality framework, multiple categories of subordinate groupings may interact. The tactics used by dominant groups to ensure their advantaged societal position include ideological rationalizations for inequality and discrimination based on prejudices, as well as repressive actions ranging from segregation to extermination.
Bibliography
Buhl, Sarah, et al. "Damned if She Does: The Subordinate Male Target Hypothesis and Discrimination of Social Dominant Female Minority Members." The British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 63, no. 3, 2024, pp. 1073-90, doi:10.1111/bjso.12716. Accessed 8 Jan. 2026.
Lewis, Daniel C. Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: A Critical Assessment of the Tyranny of the Majority in the American States. Routledge, 2013.
Rose, Peter I. They and We: Racial and Ethnic Relations in the United States and Beyond. 7th ed., Paradigm, 2014.
Rosette, Ashleigh Shelby, and Leigh Plunkett Tost. "Perceiving Social Inequality: When Subordinate-Group Positioning on One Dimension of Social Hierarchy Enhances Privilege Recognition on Another." Psychological Science, vol. 24, no. 8, 2013, pp. 1420–7.
Sarno, Elissa L., et al. "Intersectional Minority Stress and Identity Conflict among Sexual and Gender Minority People of Color Assigned Female at Birth." Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, vol. 27, no. 3, 2021, pp. 408-17, doi:10.1037/cdp0000412. Accessed 8 Jan. 2026.
"Six Negative Effects of the Systematic Subordination of Women." Columbia UP Blog, 12 Mar. 2020, cupblog.org/2020/03/12/six-negative-effects-of-the-systematic-subordination-of-women. Accessed 7 Jan. 2026.
Soen, Dan, et al., editors. Minority Groups: Coercion, Discrimination, Exclusion, Deviance and the Quest for Equality. Nova Science, 2012.
Wise, Tim J. Dear White America: Letter to a New Minority. City Lights, 2012.
Yetkili, O., et al. “The Effects of Identity (Subordinate vs. Superordinate) Salience on Intergroup Attitudes, Anxiety, and Contact Intentions in North Cyprus.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, vol. 31, no. 1, 2025, pp. 26–35, doi.org/10.1037/pac0000747. Accessed 8 Jan. 2026.
More Like ThisRelated Articles
Related Articles (5)
Related Articles (5)
- Ethno-Racial and Credit Worthiness Disparities in Access to Mortgage Credit.Published In: Social Forces, 2024, v. 103, n. 1. P. 87Authored By: Loya, JoséPublication Type: Academic Journal
- Intersectional Disparities in Youth Tobacco Use by Sexual and/or Gender Minority Status and Race/Ethnicity.Published In: Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2023, v. 25, n. 5. P. 898Authored By: Donaldson, Candice D; Stupplebeen, David A; Wilkinson, Monica L; Zhang, Xueying; Williams, Rebecca JPublication Type: Academic Journal
- Racial Inequality in Organizations: A Systems Psychodynamic Perspective.Published In: Academy of Management Review, 2024, v. 49, n. 4. P. 718Authored By: Mobasseri, Sanaz; Kahn, William A.; Ely, Robin J.Publication Type: Academic Journal
- Social Conflict and the Evolution of Unequal Conventions.Published In: Journal of the European Economic Association, 2024, v. 22, n. 5. P. 2261Authored By: Hwang, Sung-Ha; Naidu, Suresh; Bowles, SamuelPublication Type: Academic Journal
- The Effects of In-Group Identity and Clarity of the Bonus Determination Criteria on Supervisors' Discretionary Bonus Adjustments: Field Evidence from China.Published In: Journal of International Accounting Research, 2023, v. 22, n. 2. P. 103Authored By: Ho, Joanna L. Y.; Lu, Cody; Wu, AnnePublication Type: Academic Journal